במדבר, פרק ל״ו, פסוק ו׳

פרשת מסעי

Numbers 36:6Sefaria

זֶ֣ה הַדָּבָ֞ר אֲשֶׁר־צִוָּ֣ה יְהֹוָ֗ה לִבְנ֤וֹת צְלׇפְחָד֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר לַטּ֥וֹב בְּעֵינֵיהֶ֖ם תִּהְיֶ֣ינָה לְנָשִׁ֑ים אַ֗ךְ לְמִשְׁפַּ֛חַת מַטֵּ֥ה אֲבִיהֶ֖ם תִּהְיֶ֥ינָה לְנָשִֽׁים׃

The story of the daughters of Zelophehad presents a delicate balance between personal freedom and the national need to protect the wholeness of tribal lands as the Israelites prepared to enter the Land of Israel. The daughters are initially given the freedom to marry whomever they choose, but this is immediately followed by a limitation requiring them to marry within their father's tribe [רשב״ם, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. To resolve this apparent conflict, the primary approach among commentators is that, from a strictly legal standpoint, the daughters were given absolute permission to marry any man from any tribe. The limitation to marry within their own tribe was not a rigid law, but rather good advice guiding them to find a suitable match among their own people [אור החיים, תורה תמימה, רש״ר הירש, העמק דבר]. This extraordinary freedom came from their special status. Because of their righteousness, God wanted to honor them by granting a unique privilege not given to other women [אור החיים, תורה תמימה, העמק דבר]. At the same time, the advice to marry within their tribe was offered so they would not appear arrogant or more important than their peers, encouraging them to act like everyone else [העמק דבר].

Another perspective suggests that because the daughters married at an older age, they were no longer able to have children naturally. Because of this, there was no risk that their inherited land would pass to another tribe through their children, which is why they were allowed to marry into any tribe. The specific advice to marry their relatives was given so that a miracle might happen for them, allowing them to bring children into the world [חתם סופר]. On the other hand, a different view explains that the freedom granted to them did not allow them to cross tribal lines at all. Instead, it referred only to their choices within the tribe of Manasseh. They were free to marry into any family within their tribe, rather than being limited only to their immediate relatives [מלבי״ם].

Beyond the personal story of these women, this event carries a broader historical meaning. It shows that the rule against transferring land from one tribe to another was not a permanent law, but rather a temporary measure meant only for that specific generation [תורה תמימה, רש״ר הירש, הכתב והקבלה]. This temporary restriction was necessary during the critical stage of dividing the land. As the Israelites entered their new home, it was essential to prevent the territories from mixing. Each tribe needed to put down roots in its specific area, grow without interruption, and define its role in the national mission. Keeping marriages within the tribe prevented confusion and arguments when setting the first borders. Once the land was fully divided and the tribal lands were secure, this concern went away, and the restriction was canceled for all future generations [תורה תמימה, רש״ר הירש, הכתב והקבלה].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.