תהלים, פרק ו׳, פסוק ב׳

Psalms 6:2Sefaria

יְֽהֹוָ֗ה אַל־בְּאַפְּךָ֥ תוֹכִיחֵ֑נִי וְֽאַל־בַּחֲמָתְךָ֥ תְיַסְּרֵֽנִי׃

King David composed this prayer while lying on his deathbed, suffering from immense physical pain. Alternatively, this plea is understood as a prophetic vision of the Congregation of Israel in exile, enduring the vulnerability of a sick individual [אבן עזרא]. Out of his deep suffering, David admits that his own mistakes brought about his afflictions, fully acknowledging that God acts with perfect justice [מאירי]. His central request is not to escape the consequences entirely. Instead, he begs for the suffering to be measured and merciful, delivered slowly according to his strength so he can endure it. He asks that God not administer discipline out of anger, as the resulting agony would simply be too much to bear [רד״ק, מאירי, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

When looking at the dual structure of David's plea, the primary approach among commentators is to view it as poetic repetition. The second half of his request essentially mirrors the first, echoing the same thought using different words for emphasis, which is a common style in biblical poetry [רד״ק, מצודת דוד, מאירי]. However, another perspective uncovers profound, subtle differences between the types of anger and the forms of discipline David mentions.

Regarding the nature of God's anger, one view suggests that the first type David mentions refers to an external, visible anger, while the second indicates an internal, hidden fury akin to a lingering grudge [מלבי״ם]. Conversely, another viewpoint argues that the first type of anger is actually much more severe than the second [אלשיך]. There are also distinct ways God corrects human behavior. One form of correction acts as a gentle warning meant to guide a person away from a destructive path and toward a better future, whereas the other is a painful, tangible punishment for past mistakes [מלבי״ם]. Alternatively, the first type of discipline can be understood as light afflictions born of love, which do not disrupt a person from Torah study and prayer, while the second represents heavy, crushing pain [אלשיך].

These distinctions reveal a highly specific, graduated prayer. David asks that when God guides him toward a better future, He should do so without visible anger, using the gentle words of a father instructing a child. Yet, when facing painful punishment for past wrongs, which naturally involves visible anger, David begs that it not stem from a deep, internal hatred like that of an enemy, but rather remain the discipline of a loving parent [מלבי״ם]. Ultimately, David declares that he does not reject his punishment. He simply pleads that if light suffering is decreed for him, it should not be delivered with severe wrath, and if heavy suffering is required, it should not be accompanied by even the slightest degree of anger [אלשיך].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.