ישעיהו, פרק ס״ד, פסוק ד׳

Isaiah 64:4Sefaria

פָּגַ֤עְתָּ אֶת־שָׂשׂ֙ וְעֹ֣שֵׂה צֶ֔דֶק בִּדְרָכֶ֖יךָ יִזְכְּר֑וּךָ הֵן־אַתָּ֤ה קָצַ֙פְתָּ֙ וַֽנֶּחֱטָ֔א בָּהֶ֥ם עוֹלָ֖ם וְנִוָּשֵֽׁעַ׃

A profound tension exists between divine justice, human failure, and the crucial role of righteous individuals during times of crisis. Historically, there were people of high spiritual standing who joyfully pursued justice [מצודת ציון, אברבנאל], eagerly anticipating the opportunity to fulfill a Commandment [רש״י, מצודת דוד]. God interacted with these devoted individuals in various ways. One perspective suggests that God actually took their lives from the world [רש״י, מצודת דוד, רד״ק, אבן עזרא]. In this view, the righteous served as guarantors, and their passing atoned for the sins of their generation, sweetened harsh judgments, and canceled evil decrees against the Israelites [חומת אנך]. Another approach views God's interaction not as a fatal blow, but as an act of appeasement, where He accepted the pleas of the righteous who stood in the breach to defend the people [רד״ק, אבן עזרא]. A third viewpoint maintains that God simply drew close to these joyful individuals, meeting them with divine assistance and finding them worthy of His providence [מלבי״ם, שד״ל, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. In turn, these righteous leaders would pray for the nation by invoking God's ways, specifically recalling the thirteen attributes of mercy just as Moses once did [רש״י, רד״ק, אבן עזרא, מלבי״ם].

When examining the cycle of divine anger and human wrongdoing, a complex causal relationship emerges. The primary approach among commentators is that the dynamic is straightforwardly chronological: God became angry as a direct consequence of the people's sins [מצודת דוד, רד״ק, אבן עזרא], which reflected their spiritually degraded and defective state [חומת אנך, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. However, others reverse this causality, suggesting that because God first became angry and hid His face, the people lost their spiritual direction, became flawed, and were driven to sin even more [שד״ל, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. A bolder interpretation reads this dynamic as a grievance voiced by the sinners themselves. They accused God of becoming angry without cause, arguing that, much like slaves who lose their way when they fall out of favor with their master, they were pushed into sin against their will [אברבנאל].

Despite this cycle of anger and failure, there remains an enduring hope for salvation. Throughout history, in every generation, the Israelites leaned heavily on the merit and prayers of the righteous. It was through their influence that the nation was saved and divine anger passed, even if the people themselves never achieved complete repentance [רש״י, מצודת דוד, רד״ק, אבן עזרא]. Alternatively, this enduring salvation comes from looking back to God's miraculous interventions in ancient times, accompanied by prayers that He will once again act with that same historic grace [מלבי״ם, שד״ל]. Ultimately, there is a profound understanding that, by God's will, true redemption can sprout and grow from the very depths of human flaws and sins themselves [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.