שופטים, פרק י״ז, פסוק ב׳

Judges 17:2Sefaria

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר לְאִמּ֡וֹ אֶ֩לֶף֩ וּמֵאָ֨ה הַכֶּ֜סֶף אֲשֶׁ֣ר לֻֽקַּֽח־לָ֗ךְ (ואתי) [וְאַ֤תְּ] אָלִית֙ וְגַם֙ אָמַ֣רְתְּ בְּאׇזְנַ֔י הִנֵּה־הַכֶּ֥סֶף אִתִּ֖י אֲנִ֣י לְקַחְתִּ֑יו וַתֹּ֣אמֶר אִמּ֔וֹ בָּר֥וּךְ בְּנִ֖י לַיהֹוָֽה׃

A tense family conflict unfolds, centering on a massive stolen fortune, a mother's severe curse, and a son's heavy conscience. The sum involved, eleven hundred pieces of silver, was a standard and highly significant amount in that era, identical to the bounty offered to Delilah by the Philistine leaders [חומת אנך, אברבנאל].

Micah approaches his mother regarding the silver that was stolen from her [רש"י, מצודת דוד, רד"ק]. Following the disappearance of her wealth, the mother had pronounced a severe curse upon the thief [מצודת ציון, רד"ק]. The curse was highly specific. It was not directed at the past act of stealing, but rather at whoever currently held the money and refused to give it back. Realizing the danger, Micah hurried to return the silver to correct his wrong and escape the impending punishment [מלבי"ם]. His decision to confess was driven by a combination of respect for his mother and a profound fear of the curse she had unleashed [אברבנאל, רלב"ג].

The exact dynamic of their confrontation is understood in different ways. One approach suggests that the mother simply uttered the curse where Micah could hear it, prompting him to step forward and fully confess that he was the thief and had the money [רש"י, רד"ק]. Others, however, see a more calculated interaction fueled by the mother's open suspicion of her son. In this view, she initially cursed the thief privately, but then intentionally repeated the curse in Micah's presence to hint that she suspected him [חומת אנך]. She confronted him directly, stating she knew he had the silver, and Micah merely confirmed her suspicions by admitting he took it [אברבנאל, מלבי"ם, מצודת דוד].

A unique perspective suggests Micah might not have been the original thief at all. His confession may have been carefully worded to protect the actual culprit. It is possible another person stole the money and gave it to Micah. By claiming he took the silver himself, Micah prevented his mother from investigating the crime further and discovering the true thief's identity [חומת אנך].

Regardless of how the confession unfolded, the mother's reaction is immediate and forgiving. She blesses her son to God, relieved and happy that the fortune remained within the family home and had not been spent [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. More importantly, her blessing serves a crucial spiritual purpose: to actively cancel the curse. She reassures Micah that through his honest confession, he has shifted from being cursed to being blessed, ensuring the harsh words she previously spoke will not harm him [מצודת דוד, מלבי"ם, אברבנאל]. This maternal blessing remains valid and provides atonement, whether Micah was the actual thief or had simply retrieved the silver from someone else [חומת אנך].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.