ויקרא, פרק א׳, פסוק ט״ז

פרשת ויקרא

Leviticus 1:16Sefaria

וְהֵסִ֥יר אֶת־מֻרְאָת֖וֹ בְּנֹצָתָ֑הּ וְהִשְׁלִ֨יךְ אֹתָ֜הּ אֵ֤צֶל הַמִּזְבֵּ֙חַ֙ קֵ֔דְמָה אֶל־מְק֖וֹם הַדָּֽשֶׁן׃

Bringing an offering to God requires a profound internal cleansing, particularly regarding the property of others. When a bird is brought as a burnt offering, a unique procedure takes place that carries a sharp moral message about the severity of theft. Unlike domestic cattle that feed lawfully from their owner's trough, a bird flies freely and often scavenges its food from foreign fields, consuming what belongs to others. Because God despises robbery, the bird's digestive organ, which houses this stolen food, cannot be offered. Instead of being washed and placed on the altar like the innards of a cattle offering, it must be completely removed and discarded. This deliberate action serves as a powerful reminder to distance oneself from any trace of dishonesty before standing before God [רבנו בחיי, בכור שור, צאינה וראינה, תורה תמימה]. On a deeper, spiritual level, the bird represents sparks of holiness that have become entangled with the sin of theft; to elevate these sparks, the defective and corrupted elements must first be extracted and cast aside [אדרת אליהו לרבי יוסף חיים].

The priest is instructed to remove the bird's crop, the pouch in the esophagus where food accumulates before digestion [רש״י, רמב״ן, רשב״ם, שטיינזלץ]. The exact method of this removal is a matter of differing traditions. One approach, drawing on early rabbinic teachings, understands the removal to include the internal filth and intestines connected to the crop, ensuring that all the disgusting matter and stolen food is entirely cleared away [רש״י, רבנו בחיי, תורה תמימה, הופמן, לבוש האורה]. Alternatively, other scholars maintain a more literal interpretation of the procedure, explaining that the priest cuts a small opening in the bird's skin and physically tears out the crop along with the exterior skin and feathers attached to it [רמב״ן, אבן עזרא, רשב״ם, מלבי״ם, רש״ר הירש, שטיינזלץ].

Once extracted, the priest does not simply place the crop aside, but deliberately throws it from a distance. This forceful act of casting expresses a profound sense of rejection, disgust, and physical distancing from the stolen property [מלבי״ם, ביאור יש״ר]. This dramatic disposal is entirely exclusive to the burnt offering of a bird, and is not performed with other sacrifices, such as cattle offerings or bird sin offerings [מלבי״ם, אדרת אליהו, אילת השחר].

The crop is thrown to the eastern side of the altar. Specifically, the priest standing on the southern ramp of the altar would cast the refuse into the open area just east of the ramp [רש״י, מזרחי, שפתי חכמים, גור אריה, דברי דוד]. The eastern direction is chosen intentionally; as the furthest point from the supreme holiness of the Holy of Holies in the west, it is the most appropriate location for disposing of waste [אבן עזרא, רלב״ג]. The refuse lands in the place of the ashes, a designated area in the courtyard where ashes from the outer altar, the inner altar, and the Menorah were emptied each morning [רש״י, מזרחי, תורה תמימה, חזקוני]. Despite the daily accumulation of ashes, crops, and feathers, this area never turned into a massive garbage heap. A constant miracle occurred in this spot: everything cast into the place of the ashes was immediately swallowed into the earth and vanished [רש״י, שפתי חכמים, גור אריה, חומת אנך].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.