נחמיה, פרק א׳, פסוק א׳

Nehemiah 1:1Sefaria

דִּבְרֵ֥י נְחֶמְיָ֖ה בֶּן־חֲכַלְיָ֑ה וַיְהִ֤י בְחֹֽדֶשׁ־כִּסְלֵו֙ שְׁנַ֣ת עֶשְׂרִ֔ים וַאֲנִ֥י הָיִ֖יתִי בְּשׁוּשַׁ֥ן הַבִּירָֽה׃

The opening of this historical record marks a major transition, offering a rare, first-person eyewitness account of the events that shaped the era of the return to Zion. It establishes the identity of the author, the precise timeline, and the geographic setting within the Persian royal court, serving as a direct continuation of the historical records that came before it.

The opening declaration signals that from this point forward, Nehemiah himself is the author of the text [רש״י, מצודת דוד]. His personal documentation flows continuously until the completion of the wall of Jerusalem later in the account [רלב״ג]. However, despite Nehemiah being the author, the work was not originally named after him. Instead, it was considered an inseparable part of the Book of Ezra, and together they were counted as a single volume among the twenty-four books of the Bible [מלבי״ם]. The initial absence of his name was due to criticism that he took personal credit for his accomplishments and spoke poorly of the leaders who preceded him. Additionally, according to Kabbalistic tradition, Nehemiah was the reincarnation of King David and Bathsheba's firstborn son. Because that child died before being circumcised and never received a name, Nehemiah's book also initially lacked a title. As generations passed and these matters were spiritually rectified and atoned for, the book was eventually named after Nehemiah and is printed today as an independent work [חומת אנך].

The historical timeline is anchored in the twentieth year of the reign of Artaxerxes, who is also identified as Darius the Persian [רש״י, אבן עזרא, מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. The fact that the king's name is not explicitly stated right at the beginning serves as further proof of the direct continuity from the Book of Ezra, where King Artaxerxes was already introduced [מלבי״ם]. The years of a king's reign are calculated beginning from the month of Tishrei. Consequently, the events taking place in the month of Kislev occurred shortly after the twentieth year began. Understanding this calculation resolves a chronological puzzle found later in the narrative. When the following chapter details events occurring in the month of Nisan of the twentieth year, it refers to the Nisan that follows Kislev within that exact same year. This confirms that the events are recorded in strict chronological order, with the opening incidents directly triggering the events that follow [רש״י].

The backdrop for these unfolding events is the fortified city of Shushan, which served as the capital of the empire [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. More specifically, the location refers directly to the secure royal compound where the king's palace was situated [מצודת ציון].

פסוק ב׳

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.