שמות, פרק י״ז, פסוק א׳

פרשת בשלח

Exodus 17:1Sefaria

וַ֠יִּסְע֠וּ כׇּל־עֲדַ֨ת בְּנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֧ל מִמִּדְבַּר־סִ֛ין לְמַסְעֵיהֶ֖ם עַל־פִּ֣י יְהֹוָ֑ה וַֽיַּחֲנוּ֙ בִּרְפִידִ֔ים וְאֵ֥ין מַ֖יִם לִשְׁתֹּ֥ת הָעָֽם׃

The journey of the Israelites through the wilderness was not a random wandering, but a route deliberately guided by God's pillar of cloud [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. They traveled together as a complete congregation, driven either by a fear of moving away from the area where the manna fell, or by a desire to observe the Sabbath together [העמק דבר]. The narrative skips over intermediate encampments, such as Dophkah and Alush [רמב״ן, אבן עזרא, שד״ל, הטור הארוך, אבן עזרא הקצר, שפתי כהן]. This omission intentionally links their previous complaint about food directly to their current crisis over water [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך, ביאור יש״ר], or perhaps serves to conceal the shameful moments during those unmentioned stops when the people asked to return to Egypt [חזקוני].

Arriving at a barren wasteland was not a navigational error or an arbitrary decision by Moses. It was explicitly directed by God, a fact emphasized to prevent the Israelites from suspecting Moses of leading them into a desolate trap [ביאור יש״ר, אברבנאל, אלשיך]. These divinely dictated journeys were purposefully designed to purify the people from the impurity of Egypt and prepare them to receive the Torah [מלבי״ם].

Upon making camp, they encountered a severe existential crisis regarding a total lack of drinking water for the people [ספורנו, שד״ל, הכתב והקבלה, ביאור יש״ר, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. The primary approach among commentators is that the Israelites did not suffer from immediate thirst upon arrival, as they still carried water reserves from their previous stop. Their panic arose when they scouted the surrounding area and realized there was no natural water source capable of sustaining such a massive camp in the future [העמק דבר, רש״ר הירש, ביאור יש״ר, אברבנאל]. Another perspective suggests that there was a meager amount of water present, enough for minimal survival but not abundance. Because God does not alter nature with miracles unless absolutely necessary, Moses did not immediately pray for divine intervention [הכתב והקבלה]. Only after a day or two, when the reserves were completely exhausted, did true, agonizing thirst set in and trigger a severe crisis [רמב״ן, אברבנאל].

The location of this encampment, Rephidim, was more than just a dried up desert oasis [קאסוטו]; it carried profound spiritual weight. The name itself suggests a weakening or slackening of the hands, reflecting how the Israelites had loosened their grip on their spiritual pursuits. Because the Torah is conceptually compared to water, God withheld their physical water in a precise measure for measure response [אור החיים, תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, שפתי כהן]. This spiritual weakness and their failure to establish boundaries against sin also explain why they were attacked by Amalek in this specific location shortly after [תורה תמימה].

Driven by their distress, the people's reaction escalated far beyond typical dissatisfaction, erupting into a direct and aggressive quarrel with Moses. By demanding water in the plural, they directed their anger not only at Moses, but also at Aaron and Miriam, through whom they hoped a miracle might occur, and ultimately at God Himself. In this confrontation, they were not merely seeking a solution to their physical needs. They were actively testing God, challenging whether His presence truly rested among them and whether He had the power to provide water in the heart of the wasteland [רמב״ן, אברבנאל, אלשיך, שפתי כהן].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.