בראשית, פרק י״ג, פסוק י״ב

פרשת לך לך

Genesis 13:12Sefaria

אַבְרָ֖ם יָשַׁ֣ב בְּאֶֽרֶץ־כְּנָ֑עַן וְל֗וֹט יָשַׁב֙ בְּעָרֵ֣י הַכִּכָּ֔ר וַיֶּאֱהַ֖ל עַד־סְדֹֽם׃

The geographic parting of ways between a righteous uncle and his nephew marks a profound moral and spiritual split. While one chooses the quiet isolation of the open land, the other is drawn toward wealthy, urban centers known for their corruption.

The primary approach among commentators is that the plain region chosen by the nephew remains an integral part of the broader land of Canaan [רמב״ן, רבנו בחיי, ביאור יש״ר], an area stretching between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea [שד״ל]. However, the separation between the two men was absolute. Lot established a condition that Abram must not enter the plain at all [רמב״ן, רבנו בחיי, ביאור יש״ר]. This created a vast distance between them, with Abram settling in the area of Hebron while Lot distanced himself as far as Sodom [העמק דבר].

Drawn to the moist, well-watered soil that perfectly suited his livestock [תורה תמימה], Lot did not immediately settle in a single city. Instead, he wandered from town to town to find sufficient pasture for his massive herds [רמב״ן, רבנו בחיי, ביאור יש״ר]. He pitched his tents [אבן עזרא] across a wide expanse. Some explain that he owned numerous tents for his shepherds and flocks, spreading them out over a vast area that reached the very border of Sodom [רש״י, מזרחי, שפתי חכמים, ביאור יש״ר]. Others suggest a more gradual migration, where he simply moved his camp from place to place until he arrived at the city [רד״ק, מחוקקי יהודה]. At this stage, Lot lived as a nomadic herdsman under the city's protection rather than as a permanent resident [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Although later events reveal he eventually owned a proper house with doors in Sodom, it appears he maintained his tents in the open fields alongside a permanent home in the city [ברכת אשר על התורה].

These geographic choices reflect a deep moral divide. Abram deliberately avoided settling in a city filled with wicked people. He preferred isolation to protect his family and his own spiritual standing from negative influences, remaining just close enough to society to continue calling out in the name of God [מלבי״ם, רש״ר הירש]. He chose to live among the Canaanites because, despite their flaws, they were not as deeply corrupt as the people of Sodom [ספורנו]. As a righteous man, Abram made a point of separating from a nephew who was heading down a wicked path [קיצור בעל הטורים].

Lot, conversely, gladly left the safe, protected isolation of his uncle to seek out the company of the wicked in rich, corrupt cities [רבנו בחיי, רש״ר הירש]. Yet, he did show some initial hesitation. At first, he camped only up to the edge of Sodom rather than inside it, hoping to distance himself from the evil behavior of its residents. Even when he eventually built a house, he placed it on the outer edge of the city wall [חזקוני, ברכת אשר על התורה]. However, despite this early caution, the physical proximity ultimately took its toll, and he slowly began to adopt the wicked practices of his neighbors [מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.