שופטים, פרק י״ז, פסוק י׳

Judges 17:10Sefaria

וַיֹּ֩אמֶר֩ ל֨וֹ מִיכָ֜ה שְׁבָ֣ה עִמָּדִ֗י וֶֽהְיֵה־לִי֮ לְאָ֣ב וּלְכֹהֵן֒ וְאָנֹכִ֨י אֶֽתֶּן־לְךָ֜ עֲשֶׂ֤רֶת כֶּ֙סֶף֙ לַיָּמִ֔ים וְעֵ֥רֶךְ בְּגָדִ֖ים וּמִחְיָתֶ֑ךָ וַיֵּ֖לֶךְ הַלֵּוִֽי׃

A wandering Levite receives a highly tempting and multi-dimensional offer designed to end his aimless travels and convince him to settle down. Micah presents a proposal built on the promise of stability, an honorable status, and full financial backing [מלבי״ם, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

The proposition begins with an invitation to serve as a father figure, a role understood to mean a teacher, guide, and instructor [מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Alongside this, the Levite is asked to act as a priest, taking charge of a private temple [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This position is framed as a deeply respected occupation, one that perfectly suits the natural dignity of a man from the tribe of Levi [מלבי״ם].

To solidify the arrangement, Micah outlines a comprehensive compensation package. He offers a fixed annual salary of ten silver pieces, alongside a complete set of garments [רש״י, מצודת ציון, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Some commentators specify that this clothing allowance includes two distinct wardrobes tailored for the summer and winter seasons [רד״ק], while others emphasize that the garments are specifically chosen to reflect his new, dignified status [מלבי״ם]. Finally, the offer guarantees full sustenance, ensuring that all of his daily living and dietary needs will be completely met [רש״י, מצודת ציון, מלבי״ם, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

The account mentions that the Levite departed at the end of the conversation, a detail that sparks an interesting discussion since he ultimately remains in the position. The primary approach among commentators is that this movement does not represent a physical departure, but rather an acceptance. By going, the Levite is following his new employer's advice, agreeing to the terms, and setting out to fulfill his required duties [רש״י, מצודת דוד, רד״ק]. Conversely, other perspectives interpret his departure literally, though they differ on his motives. One approach argues that the Levite initially refused to work in a setting associated with idol worship and simply walked away [מלבי״ם]. Another perspective suggests that he left to carefully consider the proposal and search for alternative employment, only returning to accept the position when he could not find a better opportunity [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.