ויקרא, פרק כ״ד, פסוק י״ד

פרשת אמור

Leviticus 24:14Sefaria

הוֹצֵ֣א אֶת־הַֽמְקַלֵּ֗ל אֶל־מִחוּץ֙ לַֽמַּחֲנֶ֔ה וְסָמְכ֧וּ כׇֽל־הַשֹּׁמְעִ֛ים אֶת־יְדֵיהֶ֖ם עַל־רֹאשׁ֑וֹ וְרָגְמ֥וּ אֹת֖וֹ כׇּל־הָעֵדָֽה׃

The penalty for a person who curses God involves a highly unusual legal and spiritual procedure. Because the individual knowingly committed a severe offense whose exact punishment was previously undefined, the resulting execution becomes a deeply symbolic, public ceremony that engages the entire community.

The execution takes place far outside the boundaries of the Israelite camps, a practice that later translated to locations outside the city and the court. This distance serves two main purposes. First, it ensures that the judicial system is not perceived as a murderous institution whose primary function is to inflict punishment [רש ר הירש]. Second, the physical journey creates a crucial gap of time and space, offering a final opportunity to save the condemned man. If anyone thinks of a legal defense along the way, or if the individual recalls a valid argument in his own favor, he can be brought back to the court to have the sentence overturned [רלב״ג, רש ר הירש].

In a requirement unique among all capital cases, certain individuals must place their hands upon the condemned man's head. The primary approach among commentators is that this involves the witnesses who originally heard the curse, as well as the judges who were forced to listen to the exact words repeated during the trial. Each of these individuals places both of their hands on the man's head. This act carries two complementary meanings. First, it functions as a transfer of guilt, similar to placing hands on a sacrificial animal. Because the witnesses and judges had to hear and repeat the blasphemy, a certain spiritual flaw attached to them. By placing their hands on the man, they transfer the burden of having heard and spoken the curse back to the one who caused it. Second, the act serves as a declaration of innocence. Those involved declare that his blood is upon his own head, clearing themselves of responsibility and affirming that he alone brought about his death. On a deeper conceptual level, the blasphemer attacked the very root and essence of existence. Therefore, his death is a direct result of his own action rather than just a court decree. The statement that his blood is on his head reflects that just as he struck at the source of everything, his punishment falls squarely on his own head [גור אריה].

The execution itself involves specific details regarding the man's physical state and the crowd's participation. He is stoned without his clothing, an act intended to cause shame or to prevent improper thoughts among those watching. Although the entire congregation is instructed to participate, the actual process begins with the witnesses throwing the first stones in the presence of the crowd. The rest of the people only join in if the initial blows do not result in his death. Because the action of the witnesses is viewed as the action of the entire congregation, commentators derive the legal principle that a person's appointed agent is legally equivalent to the person themselves. The execution is therefore not a private act of vengeance by the witnesses, but a public, national duty performed on behalf of the entire nation to remove evil and uphold the honor of God [רש״י, רלב״ג, בכור שור, רש ר הירש].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.