The Israelites embraced a dangerous illusion of absolute independence, detaching themselves entirely from God's guidance in both their political structure and their spiritual life. The very blessings of economic prosperity and national sovereignty, which should have been directed toward serving God, were instead weaponized against Him, paving a direct path to their own ruin.
The ten tribes took the appointment of leadership entirely into their own hands. They crowned kings based solely on popular will and political backing, deliberately bypassing God and ignoring the need for prophetic approval [מצודת דוד, מלבי״ם, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. While the reign of their first king, Jeroboam, had been foretold by a prophet, the people never actually sought God's permission to place him on the throne. Later, when Jeroboam introduced the sinful worship of golden calves, the nation should have deposed him. Instead, they remained complicit. In fact, throughout the entire history of the northern kingdom, only one king, Jehu, was ever crowned by the explicit command of God [רד״ק, אבן עזרא].
This spirit of reckless autonomy extended to all levels of government. The primary approach among commentators notes that the people appointed ministers and officials without any regard for God, and these same leaders ultimately led the nation astray. Another perspective highlights the chaotic nature of their politics, explaining that the people would depose and remove leaders with the exact same arbitrary mindset they used to appoint them [רש״י, אבן עזרא, מנחת שי]. Taking a specific historical view, one commentator explains that the people specifically orchestrated the removal of the rare kings who refused to support the idol worship of the golden calves, actively rebelling against them in direct defiance of God's will [מלבי״ם].
This political mutiny was deeply tied to a spiritual rebellion fueled by material wealth. God had granted the nation tremendous abundance, but rather than showing gratitude, they took their silver and gold and used it to manufacture idols [רד״ק, מצודת דוד]. Their dedication to this idolatry was so intense that during periods when certain kings refused to fund the pagan rituals from the national treasury, the citizens stubbornly reached into their own private funds to ensure the worship continued [מלבי״ם].
The inevitable result of this betrayal was utter loss. The primary approach among commentators views the outcome as a precise measure-for-measure punishment: the very silver and gold that the people poured into idolatry would eventually be seized by their enemies and completely lost to them [רש״י, אבן עזרא, מצודת דוד, רד״ק, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Alternatively, the destruction would fall upon the people themselves, who would be uprooted and exiled from their land [רד״ק]. Yet another perspective suggests that this destruction was actually the people's own dark political goal: they spent their wealth on idols specifically to fund conspiracies, aiming to cut off and overthrow any ruler who dared to challenge their pagan practices [מלבי״ם].