דברי הימים ב, פרק ט״ז, פסוק א׳

II Chronicles 16:1Sefaria

בִּשְׁנַ֨ת שְׁלֹשִׁ֤ים וָשֵׁשׁ֙ לְמַלְכ֣וּת אָסָ֔א עָלָ֞ה בַּעְשָׁ֤א מֶֽלֶךְ־יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ עַל־יְהוּדָ֔ה וַיִּ֖בֶן אֶת־הָרָמָ֑ה לְבִלְתִּ֗י תֵּ֚ת יוֹצֵ֣א וָבָ֔א לְאָסָ֖א מֶ֥לֶךְ יְהוּדָֽה׃

Geopolitical and military tensions between the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah eventually reached a breaking point, culminating in a strategic border blockade. Baasha, the king of Israel, was a warrior who had seized power by force to establish a new dynasty. As he consolidated his rule, he initiated a calculated move designed to choke off all movement between the two nations [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

Dating this event to the thirty-sixth year of Asa's reign presents a significant historical challenge, as records of the kings indicate that Baasha did not live to see that year. The primary approach among commentators is that this event actually took place during the sixteenth year of Asa's rule. According to this view, the number thirty-six does not measure Asa's personal time on the throne, but rather the years that had passed since the Davidic kingdom was split during the days of Rehoboam [מצודת דוד, רלב״ג, מלבי״ם].

A profound historical and spiritual reality lies beneath this timeline. The division of the nation was decreed to last exactly thirty-six years, mirroring the number of years King Solomon was married to the daughter of Pharaoh. Consequently, in this specific year, the kingdom was destined to finally reunite. However, because Asa chose to rely on a military alliance with the king of Aram instead of placing his trust in God, this historic window of opportunity was missed, and the nation remained divided [רד״ק, מצודת דוד]. Alternatively, a different chronological approach suggests that the event did indeed occur in the thirty-sixth year of Asa's full reign. In this view, other historical calculations simply ignore a ten-year period of peace at the beginning of his rule, counting only the years he spent at war, which places this border conflict at the very end of Baasha's life [רד״ק].

When Baasha advanced toward Judah, he avoided a direct, frontal attack. Instead, he halted at the border and fortified Ramah [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This location functioned either as a border city controlling the main highways [ביאור שטיינזלץ], or as a towering structure positioned directly opposite the gates of Jerusalem, from which stones could be hurled at anyone trying to pass [מצודת דוד].

The ultimate goal of these fortifications was to completely seal the roads and prevent any free travel. Beyond a basic desire to control the trade routes and restrict the king of Judah [ביאור שטיינזלץ], Baasha was driven by a pressing demographic crisis. He had noticed large numbers of his own citizens defecting and fleeing south to Asa's territory. By building this fortress, Baasha effectively locked his borders to stop the steady leak of his population into the rival kingdom [מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.