נחמיה, פרק ו׳, פסוק ו׳

Nehemiah 6:6Sefaria

כָּת֣וּב בָּ֗הּ בַּגּוֹיִ֤ם נִשְׁמָע֙ וְגַשְׁמ֣וּ אֹמֵ֔ר אַתָּ֤ה וְהַיְּהוּדִים֙ חֹשְׁבִ֣ים לִמְר֔וֹד עַל־כֵּ֛ן אַתָּ֥ה בוֹנֶ֖ה הַחוֹמָ֑ה וְאַתָּ֗ה הֹוֶ֤ה לָהֶם֙ לְמֶ֔לֶךְ כַּדְּבָרִ֖ים הָאֵֽלֶּה׃

A threatening letter sent to Nehemiah reveals a calculated campaign of extortion and intimidation. The ultimate goal of this correspondence is to halt the rebuilding of Jerusalem's walls by spreading a false narrative about a planned rebellion against the ruling empire. The contents of the document [רש״י, מצודת דוד] begin with the claim that it is already widely known and accepted among the surrounding nations that the Jews are plotting a revolt against the kingdom [רש״י, שטיינזלץ, מצודת דוד].

To lend credibility to these rumors, the author of the letter adds a supposed witness. The primary approach among commentators is that this refers to Geshem the Arab, a familiar enemy of Judah, whose endorsement is meant to prove that the rumors are indeed widespread and verified by a known figure [אבן עזרא, מצודת ציון, ר' סעדיה גאון, רש״י, רלב״ג]. However, a unique perspective suggests that this detail does not refer to a person at all. Instead, it implies that the physical body of the letter itself stands as a testament, declaring these accusations to be true [ר' סעדיה גאון].

The core of the accusation focuses on the construction project, arguing that the fortification of the city is merely preparation for an uprising [מצודת דוד]. The charge then shifts to a direct, personal attack on Nehemiah, alleging that he actively desires and is preparing to crown himself king over the people [אבן עזרא, שטיינזלץ, מצודת ציון]. Alternatively, this personal accusation is understood as a charge of incitement, deceit, and spreading lies [ר' סעדיה גאון].

This raises a significant question: why would Nehemiah, who was operating with the full permission of the king to rebuild the wall, fear baseless rumors from neighboring nations? The reality was that the threat was far more complex and dangerous. While the surrounding nations merely assumed a rebellion was forming based on the construction, Sanballat added a layer of actual framing. He and his partners hired false prophets to publicly predict Nehemiah's coronation in Jerusalem. The implied threat in the letter was that Sanballat would report to the authorities that Nehemiah himself had hired these prophets to orchestrate his own crowning. This malicious plot would transform a pre-approved building project into a comprehensive act of treason, creating a severe danger that forced Nehemiah to address the situation [מלבי״ם].

The message concludes by affirming that such treasonous reports are actively circulating among the nations [מצודת דוד, אבן עזרא], or simply by confirming that these specific claims form the contents of the letter [רש״י]. Within the context of this elaborate frame-up, the final statements emphasize Sanballat's underlying argument: that Nehemiah's physical actions on the ground clearly prove his hidden intentions of rebellion [מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.