משלי, פרק י״ז, פסוק ט״ו

Proverbs 17:15Sefaria

מַצְדִּ֣יק רָ֭שָׁע וּמַרְשִׁ֣יעַ צַדִּ֑יק תּוֹעֲבַ֥ת יְ֝הֹוָ֗ה גַּם־שְׁנֵיהֶֽם׃

Justice and truth serve as the absolute moral foundations of the world. Any distortion of these values causes severe damage to both the social fabric and the spiritual order. God hates decisions that are clearly incorrect, as injustice remains fundamentally wrong in every circumstance [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. The primary approach among commentators views this as a direct warning to the justice system. A judge who clears a guilty person or punishes an innocent one commits a deeply despised act [רלב״ג]. This corruption of justice does not always stem from malice. During heated conflicts, facts easily become tangled. A judge might lose track of who started the dispute and who is truly in the right, accidentally flipping the truth entirely [אלשיך].

Alternatively, this moral standard extends far beyond the walls of the courtroom into everyday conversation. Simply speaking words that defend the wicked or condemn the righteous is considered a severe offense [מצודת דוד, עמנואל הרומי]. The extreme severity of these actions lies in their broader impact on society. A healthy community relies on a clear moral compass: distancing the wicked and condemning their behavior deters others from following their path, while praising and supporting the righteous encourages good deeds. Reversing these roles completely destroys society's ability to educate and guide its people [רלב״ג].

When justice is inverted, the resulting wrong is twofold. A judge who issues a reversed verdict between two opposing parties might mistakenly believe he has committed a single error. In reality, he has performed two entirely separate and deeply flawed acts within one decision: clearing the guilty and punishing the innocent [אלשיך]. This severe status applies even when these two opposite outcomes occur simultaneously in the very same ruling [מלבי״ם]. Furthermore, the circle of guilt expands beyond the judge who made the mistake to include the individuals involved in the dispute. If a person knows he is in the wrong, yet the judge mistakenly rules in his favor, he cannot simply accept and exploit the flawed decision. Remaining silent and benefiting from a distorted verdict makes that person an active partner in the injustice [אלשיך].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.