בראשית, פרק כ״ג, פסוק י״ג

פרשת חיי שרה

Genesis 23:13Sefaria

וַיְדַבֵּ֨ר אֶל־עֶפְר֜וֹן בְּאׇזְנֵ֤י עַם־הָאָ֙רֶץ֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר אַ֛ךְ אִם־אַתָּ֥ה ל֖וּ שְׁמָעֵ֑נִי נָתַ֜תִּי כֶּ֤סֶף הַשָּׂדֶה֙ קַ֣ח מִמֶּ֔נִּי וְאֶקְבְּרָ֥ה אֶת־מֵתִ֖י שָֽׁמָּה׃

A public negotiation unfolds between Abraham and Ephron the Hittite over the purchase of a burial estate. Despite Ephron’s generous offer to simply give the land away, Abraham insists on paying the full price. He speaks openly before the gathered crowd to demonstrate his sincere intentions and to show that he harbors no hidden motives [העמק דבר]. Abraham understands that accepting the field for free could create an ongoing dependency or lingering connection to its previous owner. A full-price purchase, however, completely severs the seller's tie to the property and guarantees the buyer's absolute ownership [חומש קה״ת]. Furthermore, there is a practical legal concern: if the field is given as a gift, Ephron might later retract the offer, claiming he intended the land to be used for agriculture rather than a cemetery. Only a complete financial acquisition ensures the site will remain permanently dedicated to its intended purpose [מלבי״ם]. On a spiritual level, purchasing the location at full price, through personal effort and expense, is the proper method to bring the material world into the realm of holiness [חומש קה״ת].

Firmly contradicting the previous offer, Abraham makes it absolutely clear that he has no desire to receive the property for free [רש״י, גור אריה]. He asks Ephron to keep the matter brief [אור החיים] and appeals to him with a tone of conciliation. The primary approach among commentators understands his plea as a deep wish for Ephron to listen, emphasizing his request in order to accelerate the transaction [רמב״ן]. Others view this as a direct appeal to Ephron's sincerity: if his words truly match his heart and he genuinely desires to help, he should honor Abraham's wishes and accept the payment [רמב״ן, רלב״ג].

When discussing the payment, Abraham speaks as though the funds have already been handed over. The prevailing explanation is that he is declaring the money is fully prepared and immediately available [רש״י]. Unlike land, which remains in place and can be transferred through verbal agreement, the transfer of money requires a physical action. By emphasizing that the total sum is ready on the spot, Abraham ensures Ephron will not worry about his ability to pay [ברטנורא, לבוש האורה]. The money has already been set aside and dedicated for this specific purpose, meaning that from Abraham's perspective, it has already left his possession [רש ר הירש, ביאור יש״ר].

Other perspectives offer different nuances for this sense of a completed payment. Some explain it simply as a substitute for future intent, meaning he will give the money shortly [נתינה לגר, חזקוני]. Another approach views his phrasing as formal legal terminology. Just as property deeds use past-tense language to indicate a finalized action in the present, Abraham is officially executing the acquisition, demanding that Ephron take the money to formally complete the sale [תורה תמימה]. A unique interpretation reads Abraham's statement as a rhetorical question of astonishment. Since Ephron had just claimed to have already given him the field, Abraham pushes back, asking if he has already paid for a field that Ephron claims to have given. Completely rejecting the idea of a free gift, he demands that Ephron accept the payment [פענח רזא, חזקוני]. Ultimately, Abraham concludes his request focused entirely on the upcoming burial, understanding that only after the money is accepted and the transaction legally finalized will there be no further delay [רד״ק].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.