שמואל א, פרק ז׳, פסוק ט׳

I Samuel 7:9Sefaria

וַיִּקַּ֣ח שְׁמוּאֵ֗ל טְלֵ֤ה חָלָב֙ אֶחָ֔ד (ויעלה) [וַיַּֽעֲלֵ֧הוּ] עוֹלָ֛ה כָּלִ֖יל לַיהֹוָ֑ה וַיִּזְעַ֨ק שְׁמוּאֵ֤ל אֶל־יְהֹוָה֙ בְּעַ֣ד יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וַֽיַּעֲנֵ֖הוּ יְהֹוָֽה׃

In a moment of deep national crisis, physical action and spiritual devotion merge into a single cry for salvation. The prophet Samuel steps forward to intercede for the people, combining a heartfelt prayer with a tangible offering that leads to an immediate and dramatic divine response.

Samuel takes a young, tender lamb, still nursing from its mother, and presents it as a whole burnt offering. Following the requirements of this specific sacrifice, the animal is offered and burned completely on the altar [מצודת ציון]. A subtle tradition regarding this event reveals a unique legal exception. While a burnt offering is normally required to be a male animal, the rules shifted during this period. On a private altar, offering a female animal was also permitted [רש״י, מנחת שי, רד״ק].

The act of Samuel offering a sacrifice raises a natural question, as he was a Levite and not a Priest. Following the destruction of the Tabernacle in Shiloh, the rules governing sacrifices changed, allowing them to be performed on private altars. Some commentators explain that during this era, any individual was allowed to offer a sacrifice on a private altar [רד״ק, אברבנאל]. Others stress that such an act was only permitted under the direct instruction of a prophet, making Samuel the first to implement this practice [רד״ק, אברבנאל]. Alternatively, it is possible that Samuel did not perform the physical slaughter himself, but rather directed a Priest to do it on his behalf [אברבנאל]. Regardless of the method, the ultimate purpose of the offering was to serve as a powerful spiritual tool to achieve prophecy and a deep connection to God [אברבנאל].

Samuel's plea is met with a swift and unmistakable answer from God. Commentators present two primary ways this divine response manifested. One approach suggests that a fire descended from the sky and consumed the offering. This visible miracle proved that the sacrifice was willingly accepted, filling Samuel with the confidence that salvation was at hand [מצודת דוד, רד״ק, אברבנאל]. A second approach explains the response as a miraculous sound of thunder. God's voice operated on two parallel tracks: it reached the ears of the prophet as an intimate, personal answer, while simultaneously transforming into a massive, terrifying thunderclap. This deafening roar struck the Philistine camp, throwing them into a panic and ultimately causing their downfall [מלבי״ם, רד״ק, אברבנאל].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.