במדבר, פרק כ״ה, פסוק ג׳

פרשת בלק

Numbers 25:3Sefaria

וַיִּצָּ֥מֶד יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל לְבַ֣עַל פְּע֑וֹר וַיִּֽחַר־אַ֥ף יְהֹוָ֖ה בְּיִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

The spiritual downfall of the Israelites was not a sudden collapse, but a gradual and cunning process of temptation. It began with a physical attraction to the local women, escalated into eating from pagan sacrifices, and ultimately peaked in active participation in public idolatry. The nature of their involvement was akin to the coupling of oxen bound together by a yoke [רבנו בחיי, אבן עזרא]. At this stage of the failure, the transgression was not limited to the common people, as even the elite members of the nation joined in these acts [מלבי״ם].

Despite this grave failure, the attachment to the foreign worship was largely external and superficial. It functioned like a bracelet wrapped around an arm, which can be removed without leaving a lasting mark, standing in stark contrast to the deep, internal bond the Israelites share with God. This very superficiality provided a glimmer of hope and a path for future correction [רבנו בחיי, חתם סופר]. However, not all agree on the depth of this betrayal. Some suggest that the hearts of the people were genuinely drawn to the pagan rituals [העמק דבר]. Another perspective maintains that the people did not attach themselves to the idol itself, but rather to the local worshipers, intentionally avoiding the attribution of any real power to a false deity [רלב״ג, אוהב גר].

The focus of this worship was a Moabite deity considered the ruler of the region [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. The essence of its cult was the celebration of shamelessness, degrading human beings to the level of animals [רש״ר הירש]. The ritual practice required worshipers to expose themselves and defecate before the idol [רש״י, שפתי חכמים, מזרחי]. Interestingly, some of the Israelites may not have acted out of genuine belief. They might have intended to mock and degrade the idol by soiling it. Yet, because this act of degradation was the actual prescribed method of worship, their actions legally constituted idolatry and carried the death penalty [שפתי כהן].

The divine response was swift and severe. The primary approach among commentators is that God's anger always leaves a physical mark on reality, which in this case manifested as a deadly plague that swept through the camp [רש״י, רשב״ם, שד״ל, מזרחי, גור אריה]. Because God holds the righteous to the strictest of standards, He punished them harshly and publicly. This served as a precise consequence for sins that initially took place in the secrecy of their tents [צרור המור]. Still, another view softens the nature of this divine wrath. It suggests that God was not acting out of absolute, internal rage. Instead, His anger was a form of rebuke, much like a father who displays outward anger to instill discipline and educate his child, even though his heart harbors no true anger [העמק דבר].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.