הושע, פרק ט׳, פסוק ט״ו

Hosea 9:15Sefaria

כׇּל־רָעָתָ֤ם בַּגִּלְגָּל֙ כִּי־שָׁ֣ם שְׂנֵאתִ֔ים עַ֚ל רֹ֣עַ מַעַלְלֵיהֶ֔ם מִבֵּיתִ֖י אֲגָרְשֵׁ֑ם לֹ֤א אוֹסֵף֙ אַהֲבָתָ֔ם כׇּל־שָׂרֵיהֶ֖ם סֹרְרִֽים׃

The tragedy of God's relationship with the Israelites reaches a devastating breaking point precisely where their historical bond in the land first began. The city of Gilgal, originally meant to stand as a symbol of God's kindness and the dawn of their settlement, transforms into the very center of their sin, rebellion, and ultimate disconnection from Him.

Commentators present two primary ways to understand the deep-rooted corruption that took place in Gilgal. The first approach centers on the sin of idolatry. As the first place the Israelites camped after crossing the Jordan River, Gilgal should have been a site where they constantly remembered the kindness God showed in bringing them to the land [אבן עזרא]. However, because the Tabernacle originally stood there, false prophets manipulated the holy history of the location. They convinced the people that it remained a specially chosen site and built altars for idol worship [רש״י, רד״ק, מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Their crimes in this city went beyond spiritual unfaithfulness, expanding to include bloodshed and other terrible acts [מלבי״ם]. A second approach links the corruption in Gilgal to the establishment of the monarchy and the crowning of King Saul. The very demand for a human king was a fundamental rebellion and a rejection of God's direct rule over them [רד״ק, אברבנאל, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

As a direct consequence of these sins, God declares a harsh expulsion from His home. The primary approach among commentators is that this home represents the Land of Israel itself, from which the nation will be exiled [אבן עזרא, מלבי״ם, אברבנאל, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Another perspective suggests it refers specifically to the city of Gilgal, the historical dwelling place of God [מצודת דוד]. This expulsion is absolute and final. Much like a husband who divorces an unfaithful wife, driving her from his home and cutting off her shelter and support [מלבי״ם], God will completely destroy the place of worship. Even if the people later desire to return and serve Him there, the opportunity will be entirely gone [רד״ק].

The rift between God and the nation then becomes permanent. God states plainly that He will no longer love them and will not seek reconciliation, as there is no longer any hope for their repentance [רש״י, מצודת דוד, מלבי״ם, רד״ק, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This total despair over their ability to change stems directly from their corrupt leadership. All of their leaders have completely strayed from the right path and rebelled [מצודת ציון]. Instead of correcting the people and guiding them toward goodness, the leaders are the very ones leading the nation astray [רד״ק, מלבי״ם]. This devastating failure of leadership points directly to the kings of Israel who ruled after the kingdom divided, all of whom were uniformly wicked and rebelled deeply against God [אברבנאל].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.