ירמיהו, פרק כ״ח, פסוק א׳

Jeremiah 28:1Sefaria

וַיְהִ֣י ׀ בַּשָּׁנָ֣ה הַהִ֗יא בְּרֵאשִׁית֙ מַמְלֶ֙כֶת֙ צִדְקִיָּ֣ה מֶלֶךְ־יְהוּדָ֔ה (בשנת) [בַּשָּׁנָה֙] הָרְבִעִ֔ית בַּחֹ֖דֶשׁ הַחֲמִישִׁ֑י אָמַ֣ר אֵלַ֡י חֲנַנְיָה֩ בֶן־עַזּ֨וּר הַנָּבִ֜יא אֲשֶׁ֤ר מִגִּבְעוֹן֙ בְּבֵ֣ית יְהֹוָ֔ה לְעֵינֵ֧י הַכֹּהֲנִ֛ים וְכׇל־הָעָ֖ם לֵאמֹֽר׃

A stormy period of political and spiritual upheaval grips the Kingdom of Judah just before its destruction. The central struggle revolves around whether the nation should surrender to the Babylonian empire. In a dramatic confrontation before the people and their leaders, a true prophet and a false prophet clash. This public event takes place during the very same year that Jeremiah places wooden yokes around his neck to physically show the necessity of submitting to Babylonian rule [רד״ק, שטיינזלץ, רש״י].

The timing of this encounter presents a challenge, as it is described as happening both at the beginning of King Zedekiah’s reign and in his fourth year. Commentators offer several ways to resolve this apparent contradiction. One approach suggests that it was indeed the fourth year of Zedekiah’s rule, but it is called the beginning because he traveled to Babylon that year and received expanded authority over neighboring kings from Nebuchadnezzar, marking a fresh start to his reign [רש״י, רד״ק]. Another perspective argues that the event occurred in Zedekiah's first year, and the mention of the fourth year actually refers to the Sabbatical year cycle. Together with the specific timing of the fifth month, the month of Av [שטיינזלץ], this serves as a dark hint toward the future destruction of the Temple, which would occur in the month of Av at the close of a Sabbatical year [מצודת דוד, רד״ק].

Other scholars offer different explanations for the timeline. Some suggest that the fourth year refers instead to the reign of the previous king, Jehoiakim. During that year, Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah as the crown prince, making it the true beginning of Zedekiah’s royal involvement [מלבי״ם]. Alternatively, the two timeframes might refer to two distinct events. The beginning of the reign marks when Jeremiah first delivered his prophecies of the yoke, while the fourth year points to the later moment when Hananiah stood up to publicly dispute him [אברבנאל].

During this public gathering, Hananiah steps forward. As a false prophet [רד״ק], his motivations and methods are a subject of discussion. One tradition explains that Hananiah heard Jeremiah prophesy about the impending collapse of Elam. Using simple logic, Hananiah deduced that if Elam, which merely assisted Babylon, was destined to fall, then the mighty Babylonian empire itself would surely collapse soon after [רש״י, אברבנאל]. Conversely, another view suggests that Hananiah did not rely on logical calculation at all. Instead, he experienced an ordinary dream born from his own imagination. His fatal error, which ultimately led to his punishment, was his inability to distinguish between a regular dream and a true prophetic vision, leading him to present his own personal hopes as the genuine word of God [אברבנאל].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.