ויקרא, פרק ה׳, פסוק ה׳

פרשת ויקרא

Leviticus 5:5Sefaria

וְהָיָ֥ה כִֽי־יֶאְשַׁ֖ם לְאַחַ֣ת מֵאֵ֑לֶּה וְהִ֨תְוַדָּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר חָטָ֖א עָלֶֽיהָ׃

Atonement for a failing requires much more than simply offering a physical sacrifice. It demands a profound internal and external process of recognition, which serves as the absolute foundation for forgiveness. The journey begins the exact moment a person recognizes and acknowledges personal guilt [העמק דבר]. Instead of delaying, the individual is expected to act immediately [מלבי״ם, ביאור יש״ר]. This obligation addresses specific offenses, such as withholding testimony, entering the sanctuary or eating holy items while impure, or swearing falsely [שטיינזלץ, העמק דבר].

A distinct sacrifice is required for every single instance of these offenses [רד״צ הופמן, תורה תמימה]. However, if a single action happens to violate two different prohibitions, only one offering is needed. Furthermore, this obligation does not apply to every type of legal claim, but primarily to monetary ones [תורה תמימה].

The true heart of the atonement process lies in verbal confession. While human nature instinctively seeks to hide and ignore personal flaws, a person is required to explicitly state their wrongs [מלבי״ם, שטיינזלץ]. Commentators explore the depth of this requirement from several angles. It represents a shift from a state of doubt or denial into an absolute, certain recognition of one's guilt [רבנו בחיי]. It is also deeply reflexive, meaning the individual must first confess to themselves, stripping away all self-deception in a private, intimate moment with God rather than making a public declaration [רש״ר הירש]. Additionally, the concept of confession is linked to the idea of throwing or casting away. It is not merely an admission of facts, but a profound internal resolution to abandon the sin completely and remove it from one's life [הכתב והקבלה, רש״ר הירש, רד״צ הופמן]. To be effective, this admission cannot be a vague, general statement; the individual must detail the exact nature of the specific act committed [רש״ר הירש].

Confession is established as the absolute prerequisite to the physical offering, even though the actual words are spoken while standing over the animal [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך]. This teaches that if a person denies their wrongdoing, they are exempt from a sacrifice and cannot bring one at all [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם]. The confession is meant to be recited directly over the living animal while the person leans their hands upon its head [מלבי״ם, תורה תמימה, רלב״ג, הכתב והקבלה]. The physical act of leaning is omitted from the core instruction because these specific offenses require a variable offering that fluctuates based on the person's wealth. If the individual is poor, they might bring a bird or a flour offering, which do not involve the act of leaning. This deliberate omission emphasizes that verbal confession remains an essential requirement across all types of offerings [שד״ל, ביאור יש״ר].

Although this process is detailed for specific offenses, some of which are done intentionally, it serves as the ultimate paradigm for all sin offerings. If these relatively minor infractions, which do not carry severe spiritual punishments, demand a rigorous confession, then certainly all standard sin offerings brought for severe unintentional transgressions require the exact same process [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך, רבנו בחיי, העמק דבר].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.