Justifying the ongoing construction of the Temple to the Persian authorities required a careful presentation of history. To defend their current actions, the Jewish leaders offered a brief historical review of the building process. They recounted that at the time of the original decree, Sheshbazzar—identified as Zerubbabel [רלב"ג]—arrived to begin the work. He laid the foundations of the House of God [מצודת דוד, רלב"ג ורס"ג], though some understand this to mean he built the walls of the Temple [רש"י]. Alongside this structural work, he also returned the holy vessels to the sanctuary [רס"ג].
The leaders then claimed that from those early days until the present moment, the Temple had been continuously under construction but was simply not yet complete. This seamless timeline was actually a clever diplomatic strategy. The Jewish representatives deliberately omitted a crucial piece of history: a previous Persian king had issued an explicit royal command to halt the building entirely. By framing the situation as an unbroken, ongoing effort to fulfill the original decree of Cyrus, the first king, they made it seem as though the project had merely taken a long time. This narrative provided legal standing and a strong justification for their current construction efforts [ביאור שטיינזלץ].