משלי, פרק י״ט, פסוק ז׳

Proverbs 19:7Sefaria

כׇּ֥ל־אֲחֵי־רָ֨שׁ ׀ שְֽׂנֵאֻ֗הוּ אַ֤ף כִּ֣י מְ֭רֵעֵהוּ רָחֲק֣וּ מִמֶּ֑נּוּ מְרַדֵּ֖ף אֲמָרִ֣ים (לא) [לוֹ־]הֵֽמָּה׃

Extreme financial ruin carries a devastating social cost, stripping a person not only of material assets but of their entire support network. When an individual falls into severe, crushing destitution—a state far worse than ordinary poverty [מלבי״ם]—they quickly find themselves completely isolated. A painful social deterioration begins within the immediate family. Relatives, a person's own flesh and blood, develop resentment and turn their backs once they realize they can no longer derive any practical benefit from their struggling family member [רלב״ג, מצודת דוד]. From this painful reality follows a natural, inevitable progression: if a person's own family resents them, their former friends, companions, and loved ones will certainly distance themselves completely [רש״י, מלבי״ם, מצודת דוד].

In the wake of this abandonment, a tragic dynamic of communication unfolds. The primary approach among commentators focuses on the impoverished individual's desperate attempts to maintain connection. He chases after his former companions, hoping to bridge the growing divide with conversation, but quickly discovers that his efforts are futile. He might boast of having close friends, only for reality to prove otherwise [רש״י, מלבי״ם]. Sometimes, he attempts to remind them of past promises [ביאור שטיינזלץ], or he simply tries to engage in light conversation just to receive a shred of attention. However, his former associates ignore him as if he does not exist, leaving him talking only to himself [אלשיך, מצודת דוד]. This alienation is often compounded by the fact that he frequently asks for help and food, exhausting his friends who simply do not want to hear his pleas [עמנואל הרומי].

Conversely, a different perspective suggests that it is not the impoverished person who is chasing after conversation, but rather society that is pursuing him with cruel words. People invent false accusations and fabricate things he supposedly said or did, creating a convenient excuse to cut ties. Remarks that would be entirely ignored if spoken by a wealthy individual suddenly become grounds for persecution when attributed to someone in poverty [רלב״ג, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Another approach views this focus on empty words not as the result of poverty, but as its very cause. Rather than working diligently in his youth like his peers, this individual spent his time pursuing idle chatter. Consequently, while his hardworking companions amassed wealth, he was left with nothing but the empty words he always chased [עמנואל הרומי].

Beyond the literal social dynamics, this profound isolation is also understood through spiritual and allegorical lenses. Poverty can represent a state of spiritual destitution, describing someone lacking in Torah knowledge and good deeds who attempts to teach or issue rulings without the proper ability [רש״י]. On an allegorical level, the impoverished figure symbolizes the human intellect striving to distance a person from material desires. The physical forces of the body, acting as the hostile family members, resent the intellect and pull away because its guidance directly opposes their physical cravings [עמנואל הרומי]. Finally, this theme of destructive speech and isolation connects to the story of Joseph, who brought negative reports about his brothers. In this context, Joseph is viewed as impoverished because he spoke falsehoods, and the very words he pursued eventually caught up with him when he was punished, measure for measure, for his fabricated claims [רש״י].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.