דברים, פרק כ״ג, פסוק כ״ה

פרשת כי תצא

Deuteronomy 23:25Sefaria

כִּ֤י תָבֹא֙ בְּכֶ֣רֶם רֵעֶ֔ךָ וְאָכַלְתָּ֧ עֲנָבִ֛ים כְּנַפְשְׁךָ֖ שׇׂבְעֶ֑ךָ וְאֶֽל־כֶּלְיְךָ֖ לֹ֥א תִתֵּֽן׃ {ס}

A delicate balance is established between the rights of a laborer and the property rights of an employer. A worker is granted the fundamental privilege to enjoy the fruits of his labor while actively on the job, yet clear boundaries are set to prevent exploitation and theft. The primary approach among commentators is that this permission does not apply to any random person wandering into private property, as that would inevitably lead to the ruin of the landowner. Rather, it refers exclusively to a legally hired laborer working on the premises, with the very concept of entering the land implying employment and the receipt of wages [רבנו בחיי, הכתב והקבלה, מלבי״ם, נתינה לגר]. Furthermore, the law is specific to a fellow Israelite's property, excluding a gentile's vineyard or consecrated property, which are governed by different rules [תורה תמימה, רלב״ג].

A worker's right to consume the produce is not absolute; it is strictly limited by the timing and nature of the work. Commentators agree that the allowance is valid only when the laborer is engaged with agricultural produce at the final stage of processing, specifically during the harvest when the fruit is actually being plucked. If the worker is hired for earlier maintenance tasks, such as hoeing or pruning, eating the produce is forbidden [רש״י, מזרחי, תורה תמימה, רלב״ג, גור אריה]. The manner of consumption is also regulated. The worker must eat the fruit exactly as it is. He is not permitted to suck out the juice and discard the peels, eat the fruit alongside other food to artificially increase his capacity, or gather one type of fruit when he was specifically hired to harvest another [תורה תמימה, רלב״ג, רש ר הירש, בכור שור].

The permitted quantity is defined by a balance of personal desire and basic satiation. On one hand, the worker is granted the freedom to eat as much as he wishes, even selecting the finest and most beautiful fruits [רש״י, אבן עזרא, מזרחי, תורה תמימה]. This freedom is rooted in a profound empathy for the laborer; it acknowledges the psychological toll of handling desirable food all day. Allowing him to eat ensures he has the strength and energy to work vigorously without suffering from hunger [רבנו בחיי, תורה תמימה]. Additionally, this right legally equates the worker's soul with the owner's. Just as the owner may eat his own produce before it is officially tithed, the worker is granted the same exemption at this stage [תורה תמימה, בכור שור]. On the other hand, the permission to eat is capped at satiation. The worker may eat enough to break his hunger and feel full, but gluttony is strictly prohibited. Excessive eating designed merely to exploit the situation causes unfair financial loss to the employer and is not considered a legitimate form of consumption [רש״י, אור החיים, העמק דבר, רלב״ג, תורה תמימה, רש ר הירש, ביאור יש״ר, בכור שור].

The most critical boundary is that the worker may only eat while actively harvesting and placing the produce into the employer's containers. He is absolutely forbidden from taking provisions home, sharing the fruit with his wife and children, or hoarding it in his own personal bags. Any deviation from this rule is considered outright theft [רש״י, אבן עזרא, מזרחי, רבנו בחיי, תורה תמימה, רלב״ג, גור אריה, אלשיך]. Human nature might tempt a hardworking laborer to feel entitled to take some produce home as a reward for his intense physical effort, which is why this warning must be stated so explicitly [צרור המור].

The placement of this law immediately following the laws of vows teaches a fundamental moral principle: one must fulfill personal vows using only their own resources, without ever taking from others [אבן עזרא, חזקוני]. It also serves as a practical warning for a Nazirite, who is forbidden from consuming grapes; he should avoid hiring himself out in a vineyard so as not to cause his own spiritual stumbling [קיצור בעל הטורים]. On a conceptual and Chassidic level, this law serves as an allegory for human existence. God is the owner, and the world is His vineyard. Man enters this world as a hired laborer, tasked with fulfilling Commandments and accumulating merits. The consumption of fruit represents the spiritual reward for this labor. However, the strict prohibition against hoarding fruit in one's own vessels reminds a person that Commandments must be performed purely for the sake of heaven, rather than being exploited for physical or material benefits in this world [שפתי כהן, אדרת אליהו]. Finally, the specific setting of a vineyard—yielding sweet fruit that serves as a delight beyond basic sustenance—symbolizes the highest level of serving God: acting out of joy, pleasure, and a voluntary desire to go above and beyond the basic requirements of the law [חומש קה״ת].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.