איוב, פרק י״ח, פסוק כ״א

Job 18:21Sefaria

אַךְ־אֵ֭לֶּה מִשְׁכְּנ֣וֹת עַוָּ֑ל וְ֝זֶ֗ה מְק֣וֹם לֹֽא־יָדַֽע־אֵֽל׃ {פ}

Bildad concludes his harsh speech by presenting the absolute and destructive fate that awaits wicked people and those who deny God. He describes the bitter disasters destined to strike the homes of those who commit acts of injustice [רש״י, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This severe destiny is exclusive to the wicked. By emphasizing that such suffering does not befall the righteous, Bildad firmly rejects Job's claims of experiencing unjustified pain [מצודת דוד, מלבי״ם].

A clear distinction is made between two types of sins. The first involves a person who commits unjust actions, a behavior that results in the worldly punishment of losing family and property. The second condition describes the wicked person who fails to know God [אבן עזרא]. This represents a deep internal and spiritual flaw, characterized by a lack of faith, ingratitude, or a failure to understand God. This spiritual failing is considered far more severe than unjust actions alone, as it ultimately leads to the loss of the soul and one's place in the World to Come [מצודת דוד, מלבי״ם, חומת אנך].

The concept of a place where God is unknown raises a theological question: Is there any realm hidden from God's knowledge? Rather than a lack of awareness, this absence of knowledge represents a deliberate distance and withdrawal. It is a state that God actively rejects, created entirely by the free will of the wicked person. Because injustice can never be attributed to the Creator, the sinner's choices result in a complete disconnect from Him [תקות אנוש].

Although Bildad speaks in general terms about the wicked, his words are targeted directly at Job. He implies that Job's current suffering is proof that he failed in his service to God and rejected the goodness he was previously given. Yet, Bildad chooses to speak indirectly, framing his accusations in the third person rather than confronting Job face-to-face. This approach stems either from a sense of shame in hurling such harsh accusations directly at his friend, or from a desire to leave a slight margin of doubt. By presenting this as the natural fate of any wicked person, Bildad suggests that this might be the true source of Job's tragic downfall [אלשיך, מצודת דוד, מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.