ויקרא, פרק כ״ב, פסוק י״ח

פרשת אמור

Leviticus 22:18Sefaria

דַּבֵּ֨ר אֶֽל־אַהֲרֹ֜ן וְאֶל־בָּנָ֗יו וְאֶל֙ כׇּל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וְאָמַרְתָּ֖ אֲלֵהֶ֑ם אִ֣ישׁ אִישׁ֩ מִבֵּ֨ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֜ל וּמִן־הַגֵּ֣ר בְּיִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל אֲשֶׁ֨ר יַקְרִ֤יב קׇרְבָּנוֹ֙ לְכׇל־נִדְרֵיהֶם֙ וּלְכׇל־נִדְבוֹתָ֔ם אֲשֶׁר־יַקְרִ֥יבוּ לַיהֹוָ֖ה לְעֹלָֽה׃

Following the detailed laws regarding the purity and physical qualifications of the priests who serve in the sanctuary, the focus naturally transitions to the physical and conceptual perfection of the sacrifices themselves. Bringing an offering is fundamentally a shared endeavor. The Israelite initiates the process by dedicating and presenting the animal, while the priest receives and offers it on the altar [ספורנו, צרור המור, שטיינזלץ, הופמן]. Yet, beyond the physical flawlessness of the animal, the underlying emphasis is on the purity of the offerer's intention. God does not measure the financial value of the sacrifice, but rather the sincerity and pure will of the person bringing it [שפתי כהן].

The opportunity to present a voluntary offering is remarkably broad, extending far beyond the native-born population. The invitation includes non-Jews, who are fully permitted to bring sacrifices to the sanctuary just like the Israelites. The primary approach among commentators is that without this explicit inclusion, one might mistakenly assume that offerings from non-Jews would be entirely rejected or that they would be permitted to offer blemished animals [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, ביאור יש״ר, הירש, חזקוני, אדרת אליהו, הופמן]. The inclusion also specifically embraces the righteous convert, who holds the exact same legal standing as a native Israelite [רלב״ג, ביאור יש״ר]. Some commentators note that this refers particularly to a convert who has grown up among the Israelites and achieved a profound understanding of God [העמק דבר]. Furthermore, this broad eligibility encompasses women and slaves, affirming their right and obligation to participate in bringing sacrifices [תורה תמימה, אדרת אליהו].

Voluntary offerings are categorized into two distinct types: vows and freewill offerings. These categories differ both practically and psychologically. A vow represents a personal obligation, created when a person pledges to bring an offering without specifying a particular animal. If the animal later designated for this vow dies or is stolen, the individual remains obligated to replace it. A freewill offering, however, is the dedication of a specific animal. If that particular animal is lost, the offerer is free from any further responsibility [רש״י, רמב״ן, מזרחי, שפתי חכמים, רלב״ג, גור אריה, תורה תמימה]. Psychologically, vows are typically made during times of distress or trouble as a plea for divine salvation. In contrast, a freewill offering flows from a spontaneous surge of generosity and gratitude in the heart [רמב״ן, גור אריה]. Because these offerings are entirely voluntary, a person might assume that God would accept a slightly flawed animal. To counter this, absolute physical perfection is strictly required, ensuring that voluntary gifts are treated with the utmost reverence [ספורנו, צרור המור, הירש]. Interestingly, these voluntary offerings do not have to be an individual pursuit; they can be brought through a partnership of multiple people [תורה תמימה, אדרת אליהו], or an individual might add his voluntary offering to the communal peace offerings [העמק דבר].

A specific focus is placed on the burnt offering, a sacrifice that demands two strict conditions: the animal must be completely unblemished and it must be male [בכור שור, הופמן]. The burnt offering holds special significance for non-Jews who wish to worship at the sanctuary, as it is the only type of sacrifice they are permitted to bring. Because a burnt offering is entirely consumed by fire on the altar, it aligns perfectly with their traditional theological understanding of worship as a total surrender to the divine. This stands in contrast to the peace offering, which is partially eaten by the offerers. The peace offering represents a uniquely Israelite concept where partaking in meat with joy and holiness is itself an act of serving God [תורה תמימה, הירש, הופמן, מלבי״ם, אדרת אליהו]. Finally, the burnt offering serves as a repository for sacred funds; if someone dedicates money for a specific sacrifice and there is money left over, those remaining funds are automatically allocated toward voluntary burnt offerings [תורה תמימה].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.