From the depths of exile and despair arises a painful cry, questioning whether the bond between God and His people has been permanently broken. Expressing deep sorrow and wonder through rhetorical questions, the psalmist asks if God's kindness toward Israel has been completely depleted forever, much like a physical resource that has entirely run dry [אבן עזרא, מצודת ציון].
Following this, the thought shifts to whether a certain divine declaration has been finalized [מצודת ציון]. Commentators offer two ways to understand this declaration. One perspective suggests it refers to a harsh, negative decree. In this view, the question is whether God has sealed an absolute, eternal exile, deciding never to turn back from His anger or stop abandoning His people [רש״י, אבן עזרא, מאירי]. Another approach understands the declaration as the end of God's positive promises. According to this view, the fear is that the comforting words and promises made to previous generations have simply run their course and will never be fulfilled [רד״ק, מצודת דוד, רבי משה המובא באבן עזרא].
A subtle distinction exists between the loss of kindness and the end of a promise. A promise can be tied to a specific timeframe and last for a set number of generations, which is why it can be described as reaching a state of completion. Kindness, however, has no natural boundary. Because of this, the loss of kindness is described as an absolute depletion for all eternity [מלבי״ם].
Despite the heavy tone of despair, there is a hidden layer of comfort within these questions. Even if God's promises were originally based on the merit of earlier generations, and that merit was lost due to sin, God's own kindness can never truly end. From this perspective, the idea of a finalized declaration for future generations does not signal abandonment. Instead, it points to God's ancient oath to fight against Amalek from generation to generation, a continuous battle that will eventually bring about complete redemption [אלשיך].