שמות, פרק כ׳, פסוק ב׳

פרשת יתרו

Exodus 20:2Sefaria

אָֽנֹכִ֖י֙ יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֑֔יךָ אֲשֶׁ֧ר הוֹצֵאתִ֛יךָ מֵאֶ֥רֶץ מִצְרַ֖יִם מִבֵּ֣֥ית עֲבָדִ֑͏ֽים׃

The revelation at Mount Sinai opens with a foundational declaration that serves as the bedrock for the entire Torah. It marks the precise moment a covenant is forged, establishing a king who extends His protection over His people and solidifies His absolute authority. The primary approach among commentators [רמב״ן, רבנו בחיי, מלבי״ם ואחרים] views this opening as the very first Commandment, a positive obligation to know and believe in God's existence, His divine providence, and His role as the eternal Creator. Conversely, other scholars [שד״ל, אבן עזרא, קאסוטו] suggest that this is not a commandment at all, but rather a majestic introduction. They compare it to a king who first enters a province to proclaim his sovereignty before issuing any decrees, noting that belief cannot be commanded unless the existence of the commander is already recognized. Despite this difference, both perspectives agree that this profound moment represents the ultimate acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven.

God introduces His authority using dual aspects of His divine nature to present the perfection of His leadership. One aspect reflects His eternal existence, His role as the source of all being, and the attribute of mercy. The other highlights His role as a judge who guides with personal providence, representing the attribute of justice [רמב״ן, אור החיים, מלבי״ם]. The explicit declaration of a singular presence serves to prevent a critical misunderstanding. At the Red Sea, God revealed Himself as a warrior, while at Mount Sinai, He appeared as a merciful elder. Because voices echoed from all four corners of the heavens during the revelation, the people might have mistakenly concluded that there were multiple deities. The declaration clarifies that He is one unique God, whose essence remains entirely singular even as His manifestations change [רש״י, מזרחי, דעת זקנים]. Furthermore, God speaks directly in the first person so the people can recognize their King face to face, before receiving the remaining laws through Moses as His messenger [כלי יקר].

The divine address is deliberately directed to the individual rather than the collective. This serves as a stark warning that every individual carries personal responsibility for their actions and will face justice accordingly, ensuring no one assumes they can simply hide within the majority [רמב״ן, טור הארוך]. It creates an intimate experience, as if God is speaking to each person entirely alone [חזקוני, אור החיים, רש״ר הירש]. Alternatively, the individual phrasing provided Moses with a crucial defense for the Israelites during the later sin of the Golden Calf. He could argue before God that the prohibition against idolatry was directed at him personally, rather than at the entire nation [רש״י, גור אריה].

When establishing His authority, God specifically invokes the historical rescue from Egypt rather than the creation of the heavens and the earth. The primary approach among commentators [רמב״ן, רבנו בחיי, אבן עזרא, ספורנו] explains that while the creation of the world is a monumental but unseen historical event, the Exodus was accompanied by tangible signs and wonders that the Israelites personally witnessed. They can testify to it directly. Moreover, the very act of altering nature during the Exodus serves as absolute proof of the world's creation and God's total mastery over it. Another perspective [שד״ל, הכתב והקבלה, ביאור יש״ר] draws a distinction between the nations of the world and Israel. Creation is a universal blessing that obligates all of humanity to basic moral laws, but the Exodus is a unique, private kindness shown specifically to Israel. The miraculous extraction of one nation from the midst of another obligates them to a higher, distinct system of Commandments. The sheer magnitude of being taken out of Egypt is, in itself, sufficient reason for the Israelites to be entirely devoted to God [רש״י, בכור שור].

The reminder of their previous status in a house of bondage carries deep significance. Some interpret this detail to mean the house of Pharaoh, emphasizing that the Israelites were enslaved directly to the king himself rather than to ordinary citizens [רש״י, גור אריה]. Others highlight a more degrading reality, noting that the Egyptians themselves were a cursed lineage destined for servitude, meaning the Israelites suffered the lowest possible status as slaves to slaves [רבנו בחיי, טור הארוך, הדר זקנים]. From a spiritual and moral standpoint, this detail underscores a total transition from human subjugation to divine devotion. God redeemed the Israelites from a state of choiceless servitude, stripping away all human coercion. In doing so, He acquired full rights to their bodies and souls, ensuring they were finally free to serve Him alone out of pure choice, gratitude, and love [אור החיים, ספורנו, רש״ר הירש].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.