When the prophetess replies to the delegation seeking guidance from God, her message back to Josiah begins with a highly unusual form of address. Rather than using his royal title, she refers to him simply as a man.
This choice of words sparks a discussion regarding her underlying intent. Some view this plain address as a display of arrogance toward the ruler [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Reflecting this sentiment, there is criticism directed at the prophetess for failing to show proper respect and for omitting his rightful title of king [חומת אנך].
Conversely, another approach explains that this phrasing is not rooted in disrespect, but rather serves a specific structural purpose within her message. The prophetess needed to create a clear division between two distinct parts of her vision. The first part contains a harsh decree regarding the destruction of the place and its inhabitants, while the second part is a comforting, detailed message specifically intended for the ruler himself. By referring to him merely as a man during the delivery of the grim, general prophecy, she separates his personal fate from the broader tragedy. Only after concluding the harsh decree does she address him directly by his full title, the King of Judah [רש״י].