במדבר, פרק כ״ז, פסוק א׳

פרשת פנחס

Numbers 27:1Sefaria

וַתִּקְרַ֜בְנָה בְּנ֣וֹת צְלׇפְחָ֗ד בֶּן־חֵ֤פֶר בֶּן־גִּלְעָד֙ בֶּן־מָכִ֣יר בֶּן־מְנַשֶּׁ֔ה לְמִשְׁפְּחֹ֖ת מְנַשֶּׁ֣ה בֶן־יוֹסֵ֑ף וְאֵ֙לֶּה֙ שְׁמ֣וֹת בְּנֹתָ֔יו מַחְלָ֣ה נֹעָ֔ה וְחׇגְלָ֥ה וּמִלְכָּ֖ה וְתִרְצָֽה׃

At the close of forty years of wandering in the desert, just before the Promised Land is divided, an extraordinary event unfolds. A group of women steps forward to demand a portion of the inheritance, challenging the standard conventions of property transmission. Their actions are driven by a profound love for the Land of Israel and a fierce desire to preserve their father's legacy. Their approach from the camp to the Tent of Meeting and the sitting Sanhedrin is both physical and legal [העמק דבר]. Yet, they do not act impulsively. Before standing before the national leadership, they gather to consult and plan their steps with deep modesty and gravity [אור החיים, מלבי״ם], first presenting their case to the lower courts of the leaders of tens and hundreds before ever reaching Moses [אברבנאל]. The catalyst for their claim is witnessing the men being counted for inheritance while their father is entirely absent from the registry [חזקוני]. They understand that while human beings naturally tend to favor males—viewing them as the builders of the world who are obligated in more commandments—God extends His mercy equally to all His creations [תורה תמימה].

This bold initiative reflects the overarching righteousness of the women of that generation. While the men repeatedly faltered through the sins of the Golden Calf and the spies, even asking to return to Egypt, the women remained steadfastly loyal and yearned to enter the Land [צאינה וראינה, מלבי״ם]. The detailed tracing of the women's ancestry all the way back to Joseph serves to highlight the deep roots of their devotion to the Land. Just as Joseph cherished the Land and demanded his bones be brought there, his female descendants display that exact same affection [רש״י, רבנו בחיי]. This enduring love is the direct result of Joseph's educational legacy, as he instilled a passion for the Land in his children even during the dark days of the Egyptian exile [ברכת אשר]. Furthermore, listing multiple generations without any derogatory mention indicates an unbroken chain of upright individuals, proving these women are righteous daughters of righteous men [רש״י, רבנו בחיי].

Although their father, Zelophehad, died because of a sin, he is still counted among the righteous. His transgression was a private failure rather than a mass rebellion like that of Korah, and his death ultimately atoned for his actions [שפתי חכמים, אברבנאל]. A specific perspective suggests that he was the man who gathered wood on the Sabbath, deliberately sinning for the sake of heaven to demonstrate to the Israelites the severe consequences of desecrating the day. Because of this pure intention, he earns an eternal legacy through the inheritance laws established by the merit of his daughters [חתם סופר]. On a practical level, tracing the lineage specifically to their grandfather Hepher establishes the legal foundation for their claim. Because the Land is divided among those who originally left Egypt, which included Hepher, a son born to Zelophehad would have rightfully inherited Hepher's portion. The daughters therefore demand to receive this exact portion in place of the son that was never born [אור החיים, ברכת אשר]. The genealogy also hints that the daughters are all firstborns [אור החיים, מלבי״ם] and underscores the supreme importance of the family unit within the tribe of Manasseh. Because this tribe is characterized by its many familial branches, the complete erasure of Zelophehad's name would be particularly devastating [רש״ר הירש].

The individual names of the daughters are not merely identifiers but expressions of their unique virtues. Mahlah denotes a prayer for forgiveness, Noah represents wandering in sorrow, Hoglah signifies circling the study hall, Milcah relates to taking counsel, and Tirzah reflects a deep desire to learn [שפתי כהן]. The order in which these names appear differs from how they are listed elsewhere. One perspective suggests that they are listed here according to their birth order and greatness, whereas in other instances, they are organized by their respective levels of wisdom [אור החיים, תורה תמימה]. However, the primary approach among commentators is that the shifting order is entirely deliberate. This variation teaches that all the daughters are completely equal in their wisdom and righteousness, making every single one of them equally worthy of being mentioned first [רש״י, רש״ר הירש, מלבי״ם, משכיל לדוד].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.