שמות, פרק י״ט, פסוק כ״ג

פרשת יתרו

Exodus 19:23Sefaria

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר מֹשֶׁה֙ אֶל־יְהֹוָ֔ה לֹא־יוּכַ֣ל הָעָ֔ם לַעֲלֹ֖ת אֶל־הַ֣ר סִינָ֑י כִּֽי־אַתָּ֞ה הַעֵדֹ֤תָה בָּ֙נוּ֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר הַגְבֵּ֥ל אֶת־הָהָ֖ר וְקִדַּשְׁתּֽוֹ׃

Moments before the revelation at Mount Sinai, a profound dialogue unfolds between God and Moses. Instructed to descend and warn the Israelites once more against approaching the mountain, Moses expresses puzzlement over the necessity of a repeated caution. The primary approach among commentators is that Moses viewed an additional warning as redundant, noting that the people had already been restricted and were strictly observing this prohibition for three days [רש״י, בכור שור]. Alternatively, some scholars understand the Israelites' inability to ascend in a much more literal and spiritual sense. At Sinai, the evil inclination was entirely uprooted from their hearts, returning them to the pristine spiritual state of Adam before the first sin. In this elevated condition, they possessed no natural desire or capacity to disobey God, leading Moses to conclude that an unauthorized ascent was fundamentally impossible [מלבי״ם, צפנת פענח, חזקוני].

Other perspectives highlight Moses' personal and logical motivations. Yearning to remain close to the Divine Presence on the mountain, Moses argued that his physical presence below was not required to enforce the boundary [ביאור יש״ר]. Furthermore, he reasoned that since he and Aaron were strictly warned against crossing the limits, the general populace would certainly not dare to breach a partition that even their leaders could not pass [העמק דבר, מלבי״ם]. A different approach suggests Moses was acting in accordance with the etiquette of royal messengers, who respectfully recount their previous instructions before receiving new orders, though this view remains debated [אבן עזרא, הטור הארוך, אבי עזר]. Shifting from a declarative interpretation, some commentators read Moses' response as an astonished question. Hearing God's concern that the people might break through to look, Moses wondered if a new, harsher decree was being introduced that forbade even looking from afar. God then clarified that he must go down and that the prohibition remained solely against physically ascending the mountain [רשב״ם, אבן עזרא].

Despite Moses' reservations, God insisted on a second warning for several critical reasons. First, a directive is most effective when issued at the exact moment of action. Moses did not realize that the Divine speech was about to commence immediately, meaning he would soon be unable to physically restrain the crowd [רשב״ם, גור אריה]. Second, through His divine providence, God knew that the Israelites' overwhelming joy and intense yearning to witness the Divine Presence might cloud their judgment, causing them to cross the boundary thoughtlessly [הטור הארוך]. Additionally, the second warning introduced new legal dimensions. While the initial boundary carried a human death penalty of stoning, the renewed caution added the threat of death by Heavenly decree. God was also preparing to allow Aaron and the priests to ascend part of the mountain. Without a specific new warning, the Israelites might have used flawed logic to assume that if the priests were permitted to go up, the rest of the nation could follow suit [אור החיים].

Beyond merely enforcing physical limits, God's command for Moses to descend served a profound theological purpose. By requiring Moses to stand physically among the people during the giving of the Ten Commandments, God ensured that no one could mistakenly attribute the heavenly voice to their human leader. Seeing Moses standing beside them provided absolute certainty that the voice echoing from the summit was undeniably the voice of God [אברבנאל]. As this boundary was established, a slight conceptual shift occurs regarding the instruction to set bounds about the mountain, whereas the original command was to set bounds about the people. Commentators clarify that there is no contradiction here, as bounding the people and bounding the mountain are simply two sides of the same separating action [קאסוטו]. Ultimately, this separation served to declare the mountain as holy ground, a place of such intense sanctity that any man or beast who touched it could not survive [ספורנו].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.