מלכים ב, פרק ט״ו, פסוק ה׳

II Kings 15:5Sefaria

וַיְנַגַּ֨ע יְהֹוָ֜ה אֶת־הַמֶּ֗לֶךְ וַיְהִ֤י מְצֹרָע֙ עַד־י֣וֹם מֹת֔וֹ וַיֵּ֖שֶׁב בְּבֵ֣ית הַחׇפְשִׁ֑ית וְיוֹתָ֤ם בֶּן־הַמֶּ֙לֶךְ֙ עַל־הַבַּ֔יִת שֹׁפֵ֖ט אֶת־עַ֥ם הָאָֽרֶץ׃

A moment arrives when the heights of political power clash with human limitations and the strict boundaries set by God. The king of Judah is struck with a severe physical impurity, forcing him to abandon his active throne and live in complete isolation while the duties of leadership pass to his son.

The primary approach among commentators is that the reason God struck the king is detailed in the Book of Chronicles. Uzziah had entered the Temple to burn incense on the altar, reacting with anger and confrontation toward the priests who protested his intrusion. Yet, his specific sin is omitted in this account. This omission suggests that, despite his grave error, his internal motives were genuinely directed toward heaven [חומת אנך]. On a deeper level, this punishment echoes the ancient rebellion of Korah. The same skin disease that once temporarily struck the hand of Moses served as a lasting warning that anyone who attempts to usurp the duties of the priesthood will face this exact affliction [רד״ק].

Even though the king is plagued by this severe impurity, he retains his royal title. A person suffering from this condition is considered akin to someone who has passed away. Just as a deceased ruler is still respectfully referred to as a king, Uzziah maintains his title despite his living death [חומת אנך].

Because his severe impurity forbade him from remaining within the city, Uzziah relocated to a specialized house of isolation situated outside of Jerusalem [רלב״ג, ביאור שטיינזלץ, רד״ק]. Commentators offer two main perspectives on the unique name of this dwelling, which implies a sense of freedom. The first perspective views kingship as a form of servitude, burdened by endless toil and the constant needs of the public. Once isolated, Uzziah was finally free from the heavy yoke of leadership, daily affairs, and labor [מצודת דוד, רלב״ג, רד״ק, חומת אנך]. The second perspective links the location directly to death, suggesting that Uzziah built his home near a cemetery, reflecting the idea that only among the dead is one truly free [רש״י, רד״ק, חומת אנך].

Since Uzziah could no longer actively govern from his isolation, even though he was never officially deposed, his son Jotham was placed in charge of the royal palace and assumed the role of judging the nation [מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. There are differing views regarding the timeline of Jotham's leadership. A straightforward reading suggests that Jotham judged the people throughout the entire duration of his father's illness. However, an older tradition indicates that Jotham was actually born in the very year his father was struck with the disease. According to this view, the nation's ministers and elders managed the affairs of the state until Jotham matured and was capable of ruling independently [רד״ק].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.