יואל, פרק א׳, פסוק א׳

Joel 1:1Sefaria

דְּבַר־יְהֹוָה֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר הָיָ֔ה אֶל־יוֹאֵ֖ל בֶּן־פְּתוּאֵֽל׃

Prophetic visions often begin by establishing their divine origin and the identity of the messenger before unfolding into complex imagery. Here, the message is firmly declared to be the direct word of God [מצודת דוד]. The central theme of this vision, however, is understood in two distinct ways. The primary approach views the impending events as a literal historical account of a devastating locust plague. In this view, God brings the swarm upon the land of Israel as a consequence of the people's sins, leaving destruction in its wake, which is ultimately followed by promises of future comfort and the Messianic era [רד״ק, מלבי״ם]. Conversely, another perspective reads the entire vision as a sweeping historical allegory. Rather than physical insects, the locusts serve as a symbol for four major empires—Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome—destined to oppress Israel and destroy the Temple, with four distinct types of locusts perfectly mirroring these four nations [אברבנאל].

While the message was delivered to Joel, the exact era in which he lived remains a mystery [אבן עזרא, אברבנאל]. Over time, multiple traditions have emerged to place him in history. One tradition suggests he prophesied during the reign of Jehoram, son of Ahab, specifically during a severe seven-year famine foretold by Elisha, which consisted of four years of locusts and three years of drought [רש״י, רד״ק]. Another tradition places him later, during the reign of Manasseh, king of Judah, alongside the prophets Nahum and Habakkuk. In this scenario, the king's name was deliberately left out of the record due to his profound wickedness [רש״י, רד״ק]. A third possibility suggests he lived during the time of Hosea and prior to Amos, delivering his message exclusively to the Kingdom of Judah and the city of Jerusalem [אברבנאל].

The identity of Joel's father, Pethuel, has also sparked significant discussion. A traditional approach suggests that Pethuel is actually the prophet Samuel, with this specific name reflecting how he successfully persuaded God through his prayers [רש״י, מצודת דוד]. According to this line of thought, even though Samuel's sons initially strayed, they eventually achieved complete repentance, and it was through the merit of their father's prayers that Joel was granted the gift of prophecy [חומת אנך]. However, those who focus on a strict reading of the text strongly reject this connection. They argue that Pethuel is a separate individual entirely, pointing out that Samuel's sons were explicitly condemned for their poor conduct [אבן עזרא, אברבנאל]. Despite this disagreement, there is a clear consensus regarding the father's prestige. A well-established rule in prophetic writings is that whenever a prophet's father is explicitly named, it indicates that the father was a highly respected and important figure in his own right [אבן עזרא, אברבנאל]. Some even conclude that this specific mention proves Joel was a prophet born to a prophet [אברבנאל].

פסוק ב׳

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.