שמואל ב, פרק כ״ד, פסוק א׳

II Samuel 24:1Sefaria

וַיֹּ֙סֶף֙ אַף־יְהֹוָ֔ה לַחֲר֖וֹת בְּיִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל וַיָּ֨סֶת אֶת־דָּוִ֤ד בָּהֶם֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר לֵ֛ךְ מְנֵ֥ה אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל וְאֶת־יְהוּדָֽה׃

A hidden crisis between God, the nation of Israel, and their king sets the stage for a tragic chain of events shaped by divine decree and human frailty. A sudden, intense divine anger flares up against the people, though the exact cause remains unstated [רש״י]. The primary approach among commentators is that this wrath is a continuation of previous national traumas, such as the three-year famine caused by the mistreatment of the Gibeonites or the plague that followed Absalom’s rebellion [רד״ק, רלב״ג, מצודת דוד, שטיינזלץ]. As for the specific trigger of this current anger, some suggest the nation was tainted by hidden sins that David was entirely unaware of and therefore could not root out [רד״ק, מצודת דוד]. Alternatively, the anger stemmed from a national betrayal: the Israelites had recently rebelled against the Davidic dynasty by following Sheba the son of Bichri. Because the people sinned against their king, divine justice dictated that their punishment would be brought about through that very king [אברבנאל, מלבי״ם, מצודת דוד]. Another perspective proposes that the people had accumulated many transgressions that had not yet reached the threshold for punishment. The ensuing events were designed to bring their guilt to completion so they could finally face judgment [אלשיך].

This situation raises a profound theological question regarding divine incitement: how could God provoke a person to sin and then punish him for it? To resolve this, one approach explains that the incitement is attributed to God only in a broad, indirect sense, as He is the primary cause of everything in the universe. In reality, it was David's own heart that led him astray [רלב״ג]. A more widely held view clarifies that the actual provocation came from an adversarial force, such as Satan, the evil inclination, or a destructive angel. God merely allowed this harmful thought to penetrate the king's mind, choosing not to intervene and stop it [מצודת דוד, רד״ק, שטיינזלץ, אלשיך].

The actual command to count the people of Israel and Judah was sinful for several possible reasons. One approach focuses on the flawed method of the census. David counted the nation without a practical necessity, and he tallied them by head rather than collecting a monetary ransom as required by Torah law. Such direct counting removes the divine blessing that rests only upon things hidden from the eye, exposing the people to the lethal effects of the evil eye [רד״ק, רלב״ג, מלבי״ם]. Conversely, the sin may not have been in the method, but in a deep moral and spiritual failing. David, a deeply pious king who had relied exclusively on God his entire life, succumbed to pride in his old age. He began placing his confidence in his military strength and the sheer size of his population. Because of his immense spiritual stature, even a minor lapse in trusting God was judged as a severe transgression [רלב״ג, אברבנאל]. Finally, the motivation for the census might have been rooted in political paranoia. Scarred by recent uprisings, David lost faith in the loyalty of his subjects. He sought to count and register them systematically to ensure no one would evade military service during wartime. This profound lack of trust ultimately led to disastrous consequences [מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.