שמואל ב, פרק כ״ד, פסוק י״ג

II Samuel 24:13Sefaria

וַיָּבֹא־גָ֥ד אֶל־דָּוִ֖ד וַיַּגֶּד־ל֑וֹ וַיֹּ֣אמֶר ל֡וֹ הֲתָב֣וֹא לְךָ֣ שֶׁבַע־שָׁנִ֣ים ׀ רָעָ֣ב ׀ בְּאַרְצֶ֡ךָ אִם־שְׁלֹשָׁ֣ה חֳ֠דָשִׁ֠ים נֻסְךָ֨ לִפְנֵי־צָרֶ֜יךָ וְה֣וּא רֹדְפֶ֗ךָ וְאִם־הֱ֠י֠וֹת שְׁלֹ֨שֶׁת יָמִ֥ים דֶּ֙בֶר֙ בְּאַרְצֶ֔ךָ עַתָּה֙ דַּ֣ע וּרְאֵ֔ה מָה־אָשִׁ֥יב שֹׁלְחִ֖י דָּבָֽר׃ {ס}

The prophet Gad presents King David with a difficult and fateful choice, outlining three paths of national punishment. He asks if David will accept this judgment [ביאור שטיינזלץ, מלבי״ם] as a substitute for the plague that was destined to strike the nation anyway, a consequence of conducting a census without collecting the required ransom [מצודת דוד].

The first option is seven years of famine. While another biblical record mentions only three years, the primary approach among commentators explains that the new decree was indeed for three years. However, because the Israelites had just endured three consecutive years of famine, the total reached six. A seventh year of famine would naturally follow, as the parched land would require time to yield a new harvest [רד״ק, מצודת דוד, אברבנאל]. Another perspective suggests that three years of famine would occur during David's lifetime, with the remaining years unfolding after his death [מלבי״ם].

The second option is military defeat, forcing the nation to flee from their enemies [מצודת ציון, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This pursuit would be so relentless that everyone would recognize it as a direct decree from God rather than a natural military victory [רד״ק]. The focus of this punishment is the reality of defeat and falling by the sword, rather than David himself dying in battle or suffering abuse at the hands of his enemies [אברבנאל].

The third option is a severe, contagious plague [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. In truth, this option represents a degree of leniency. The people were already exposed to natural harm simply by being counted in the census. Out of mercy for David, God decided to transform this vulnerability into a limited, brief punishment directly overseen by Him [אברבנאל, מצודת דוד]. The choices are presented in descending order, moving from the longest and most severe to the shortest and lightest: years of famine, months of war, and finally, mere days of plague [מלבי״ם]. The recurring number three is intentional, hinting at the three times the Israelites rebelled against David, or paralleling the three decrees David once foresaw falling upon King Saul [אברבנאל].

Concluding his message, the prophet urges David to reflect deeply with an understanding heart [מצודת דוד] and decide how to answer God, who sent him [מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. David ultimately chooses the plague, reasoning that famine is the harshest punishment, while war brings disgrace and a humiliating dependence on human beings. A plague, however, comes directly from Heaven. Furthermore, disease strikes everyone equally. This prevented the public from claiming that the king, shielded by his wealth and military might, chose a punishment that would spare him personally. Ultimately, the census was a hidden mechanism to punish the Israelites for their previous sins without causing them to resent their king. Yet David, acting as a faithful shepherd, willingly took the blame upon himself [אברבנאל].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.