דברים, פרק ג׳, פסוק כ״ח

פרשת ואתחנן

Deuteronomy 3:28Sefaria

וְצַ֥ו אֶת־יְהוֹשֻׁ֖עַ וְחַזְּקֵ֣הוּ וְאַמְּצֵ֑הוּ כִּי־ה֣וּא יַעֲבֹ֗ר לִפְנֵי֙ הָעָ֣ם הַזֶּ֔ה וְהוּא֙ יַנְחִ֣יל אוֹתָ֔ם אֶת־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר תִּרְאֶֽה׃

The transition of leadership between a monumental prophet and his successor marks a deeply sensitive and critical juncture in the life of a nation. The instructions given to Moses regarding Joshua distill the very essence of transferring authority, defining a completely new style of leadership while revealing the profound connection between the departing leader and the one stepping into his role. Moses is tasked with issuing a multifaceted directive to his successor. The primary approach among commentators suggests this is not a tactical military briefing, but rather an emotional and social preparation. Moses must ready Joshua to bear the psychological weight of leadership, urging him to endure the inevitable burdens, troubles, and quarrels of the people [רש"י, מזרחי, גור אריה, ביאור יש"ר]. Another perspective views this mandate as an immediate transfer of authority, requiring Moses to publicly establish Joshua as a military commander and active leader even while Moses is still alive [אור החיים, קיצור בעל הטורים]. Furthermore, this instruction serves as a vital urging [תורה תמימה, רש"ר הירש], obligating Joshua in the oral traditions of the Torah so that he will not falter when he can no longer ask his teacher to resolve his doubts [מלבי"ם], while also guiding him on the practicalities of dividing the land [רלב"ג].

Because Moses cannot physically impart strength, he must use his words to instill stability and fortitude within his successor [רש"י, מזרחי, שפתי חכמים, אוהב גר]. This encouragement is crucial for several reasons. Beyond the obvious need for resolve to fight opposing nations and eradicate their idols [בכור שור, רלב"ג], Joshua faces a deep internal fear regarding his heavy responsibility. Witnessing his master face punishment and lose the right to enter the land because of the people's actions, Joshua naturally fears that he too might suffer a similar fate. Thus, Moses must explicitly assure him that he will indeed cross the river and successfully settle the nation [רש"י, ביאור יש"ר]. The encouragement Moses offers is twofold: providing both a focused, immediate burst of power and a continuous, enduring resilience. Had Moses been entering the land alongside him, temporary encouragement would have sufficed, as Moses would be there to support him. However, since Joshua must lead alone, he requires a permanent fortitude [מלבי"ם]. This inner strength must manifest as dedication to Torah study and courage in performing good deeds [אדרת אליהו], ensuring that absolutely nothing deflects him from his path of duty [רש"ר הירש].

A distinct condition is placed upon Joshua's success, signaling a fundamental shift in the nation's leadership model. Joshua must march at the very front of the people; if he remains behind the battle lines, the nation will fail [רש"י, אדרת אליהו]. This principle is starkly illustrated later during the battle of Ai, where the Israelites suffer defeat precisely because Joshua does not lead the fighters, prompting God to order him to take his rightful place at the vanguard [רש"י, שפתי חכמים, ברכת אשר]. This requirement highlights the transition from Moses' model of a "shepherd" to Joshua's model of a "king." A shepherd walks behind his flock, watching over them and taking intense personal responsibility for their missteps—a burden Moses bore until his death in the desert. A king, however, strides ahead to forge the path, while the people are tasked with protecting him. Lacking the immense spiritual capacity that Moses possessed to carry the shepherd's burden, Joshua requires profound encouragement to embrace his new role as a king leading from the front [אדרת אליהו - ר' יוסף חיים]. Joshua earned this monumental privilege through his profound humility during Moses' lifetime, often remaining silent out of deep reverence for his teacher [נחל קדומים].

Although Moses is restricted to merely looking at the land rather than entering it [ביאור שטיינזלץ], this gaze is far from a passive act of missed opportunity. God comforts Moses by conveying that as long as his devoted student leads, it is as if Moses himself continues to live and act. The very act of Moses gazing upon the land actively softens it, preparing the territory for conquest. His vision decisively shapes reality [העמק דבר], and it is ultimately through the enduring power of Moses' sight that Joshua is empowered to lead the people to their inheritance [שפתי כהן].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.