שמות, פרק ל״ה, פסוק כ״ד

פרשת ויקהל

Exodus 35:24Sefaria

כׇּל־מֵרִ֗ים תְּר֤וּמַת כֶּ֙סֶף֙ וּנְחֹ֔שֶׁת הֵבִ֕יאוּ אֵ֖ת תְּרוּמַ֣ת יְהֹוָ֑ה וְכֹ֡ל אֲשֶׁר֩ נִמְצָ֨א אִתּ֜וֹ עֲצֵ֥י שִׁטִּ֛ים לְכׇל־מְלֶ֥אכֶת הָעֲבֹדָ֖ה הֵבִֽיאוּ׃

The call to build the Tabernacle inspired a massive wave of generosity across all levels of society. The Israelites donated whatever materials they possessed, offering a glimpse into the economic realities of the time. When it came to silver and copper, these contributions were viewed differently than gold. The primary approach among commentators is that silver and copper were common metals used for everyday coins and utensils, whereas gold was rare and highly prized, often found only in jewelry. Because of its prestige, a person donating gold would proudly show it for all to see, and the community would celebrate the significant gift. In contrast, silver and copper were simply separated and set aside without fanfare [רבנו בחיי, תולדות יצחק, ביאור יש״ר, צאינה וראינה].

The act of setting aside these common metals was deeply rooted in daily life. Since silver and copper drove local commerce, merchants were already accustomed to separating a portion of their profits for charity to ensure success in their businesses. Now, they redirected this standard practice specifically toward the Tabernacle [העמק דבר]. Furthermore, because these coins were essential for basic survival, individuals could not afford to give away all their money, meaning they could only separate a fraction of it [מלבי״ם]. This broad call to give ensured that everyone participated, including those usually exempt from communal obligations, such as individuals under twenty or over sixty years old [חזקוני], encompassing both mandatory dues and voluntary offerings [אבן עזרא הקצר]. Ultimately, grouping silver and copper together conveys a profound moral lesson about equality. The silver of the wealthy and the copper of the poor are entirely equal before God, provided the gift is given with a pure heart and without pride [אדרת אליהו].

Beyond metals, the Israelites also donated acacia wood, prompting discussion about its availability in the desert. Some suggest these trees did not grow in the region, meaning the people could only contribute wood they already had in their possession [ביאור יש״ר]. Others argue that owning acacia wood was actually quite common among the people [ברכת אשר על התורה], or that they simply cut down nearby trees and purchased timber from passing merchants [קאסוטו]. Regardless of its source, they supplied wood perfectly sized for construction [ביאור שטיינזלץ], and notably, no one hoarded it to sell for personal profit [מלבי״ם]. This wood was essential not only for the structure and vessels of the Tabernacle but also for crafting the very tools needed for the construction [העמק דבר]. The building process was far more than mere carpentry, as it was a supreme national mission. The people dedicated themselves to the work like devoted servants fulfilling the will of their Master [רש״ר הירש], and their sheer dedication is highlighted by the simple, powerful act of bringing their contributions forward [קאסוטו].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.