מלכים א, פרק ה׳, פסוק י״ז

I Kings 5:17Sefaria

אַתָּ֨ה יָדַ֜עְתָּ אֶת־דָּוִ֣ד אָבִ֗י כִּ֣י לֹ֤א יָכֹל֙ לִבְנ֣וֹת בַּ֗יִת לְשֵׁם֙ יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהָ֔יו מִפְּנֵ֥י הַמִּלְחָמָ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר סְבָבֻ֑הוּ עַ֤ד תֵּת־יְהֹוָה֙ אֹתָ֔ם תַּ֖חַת כַּפּ֥וֹת (רגלו) [רַגְלָֽי]׃

In his message to Hiram, King of Tyre, King Solomon explains the historical delay in fulfilling the dream of building a permanent Temple. Although King David desperately wanted to construct the house of God, political realities and Divine will dictated that the task pass to his son. On a practical level, Solomon explains that David was entirely consumed by continuous wars against enemies surrounding him on every side [רד״ק]. A massive construction project of this scale simply requires an era of complete peace and quiet [מלבי״ם, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. However, Solomon offers this practical justification strictly for public diplomacy. He deliberately conceals the true reason from Hiram to protect his father's honor, hiding the fact that God actively prevented David from building the Temple because he was a man of war who had shed blood [רד״ק, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

Beyond the practical distractions of war, the delay was rooted in strict legal and spiritual principles. According to the Torah, there is a binding sequence of events: God must first grant the nation total rest from its enemies, and only afterward can the chosen house be built [רש״י, מלבי״ם]. Furthermore, constructing the Temple requires absolute purity of intention, done solely for the sake of God without any desire for personal gain. Because David had received a prophetic promise that building the Temple would bring him relief from his enemies, it was impossible for him to build it without secretly hoping to achieve peace for himself. Solomon, by contrast, already lived in a time of natural peace. He could therefore approach the construction with a completely pure heart, free from any personal motives [מלבי״ם].

David spent his entire life engaged in battle, and this state of conflict lasted until God finally completed the subjugation of the nation's enemies during Solomon's reign [מצודת דוד]. A subtle detail in the text captures this generational shift. The written record hints that David ultimately saw his enemies fall beneath his own feet, acknowledging his lifelong struggle and eventual triumph. Yet, the spoken tradition shifts the focus to Solomon's feet. This change reflects Solomon's reality: he is the one who emerged as a man of true rest, free from war, and blessed with the time and tranquility necessary to finally build the house of God [רד״ק, מנחת שי].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.