יחזקאל, פרק י״ח, פסוק כ״ט

Ezekiel 18:29Sefaria

וְאָֽמְרוּ֙ בֵּ֣ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יִתָּכֵ֖ן דֶּ֣רֶךְ אֲדֹנָ֑י הַדְּרָכַ֞י לֹ֤א יִתָּֽכְנוּ֙ בֵּ֣ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל הֲלֹ֥א דַרְכֵיכֶ֖ם לֹ֥א יִתָּכֵֽן׃

A profound theological debate unfolds between the people and God regarding the fairness of divine justice. The people accuse God of inconsistency and unfairness in His judgments, prompting a direct response where God turns the accusation back upon them, proving that the instability lies entirely in human behavior. The core of the people's grievance is that God's methods appear improper or unjust [רש״י].

Commentators offer different perspectives on what exactly troubled the nation. One approach explains that the people struggled to grasp the mechanics of repentance and reward. They wondered how it could be fair for a wicked person to repent and have their entire past erased, while a righteous person who commits a sin suddenly loses a lifetime of merit. These dramatic shifts led them to argue that God's system is inconsistent and constantly changing [מלבי״ם]. This complaint is raised repeatedly to address both sides of the issue: the righteous person who falls away, and the wicked person who returns to goodness [אברבנאל].

Another perspective presents a more complex psychological and legal grievance. The people felt they were being treated unjustly because they believed intentional sins are the unavoidable result of earlier, unintentional mistakes. In their minds, if a chain of wrongdoing began by accident or under circumstances beyond their control, it is unfair to be punished severely for the intentional sins that naturally followed. Furthermore, they argued that while God's kindness should certainly reward a good deed that leads to another good deed, His strict justice should not punish a sin that merely drags along another sin. Based on this logic, they concluded that God's judgment was simply unfair [חומת אנך].

In response, God firmly asserts that plain logic and common sense prove His judgments are grounded in absolute justice [מצודת דוד]. Addressing the full variety of their complaints [רד״ק, חומת אנך], He clarifies that the inconsistency they perceive does not exist in His actions. Rather, the instability is found in the erratic nature of human beings who constantly change their behavior [מלבי״ם]. In truth, it is every single one of the human paths that is deeply flawed [רד״ק].

Confronting their specific legal defense, God completely rejects the idea that an unintentional mistake forces a person into intentional rebellion. He makes it clear that every single action is judged on its own merits and severity. A person bears full and absolute responsibility for all their crimes, even if those offenses were triggered by earlier failures. The heavenly court operates with the exact same logical justice as an earthly court. Therefore, the ultimate message to the people is to stop hiding behind philosophical excuses, take personal responsibility, and repent [חומת אנך, אברבנאל].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.