במדבר, פרק כ״ד, פסוק י״ז

פרשת בלק

Numbers 24:17Sefaria

אֶרְאֶ֙נּוּ֙ וְלֹ֣א עַתָּ֔ה אֲשׁוּרֶ֖נּוּ וְלֹ֣א קָר֑וֹב דָּרַ֨ךְ כּוֹכָ֜ב מִֽיַּעֲקֹ֗ב וְקָ֥ם שֵׁ֙בֶט֙ מִיִּשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וּמָחַץ֙ פַּאֲתֵ֣י מוֹאָ֔ב וְקַרְקַ֖ר כׇּל־בְּנֵי־שֵֽׁת׃

Shifting his gaze from the immediate encampment of the Israelites, the prophet of the nations looks far into the horizon of history. He delivers a poetic and lofty vision of future leadership, victory, and royalty. This prophecy serves a dual purpose: it calms the immediate anxiety of the Moabite king by pushing the threat into the distant future, yet simultaneously seals his nation's ultimate doom in the end of days.

The prophet uses poetic repetition to emphasize that these monumental events will not occur anytime soon [אבן עזרא, רלב״ג, חזקוני, הדר זקנים]. By stressing the distance of this vision, he seeks to alleviate the king's fears, making it clear that while the future rise of the Israelites is inevitable, they pose no immediate threat [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך, רש״ר הירש]. Some commentators note a subtle progression in the prophet's vision, distinguishing between events in the relatively near future and the anticipation of a profoundly distant era [מלבי״ם]. Interestingly, while this gentile prophet presents salvation as a distant reality to downplay an impending danger, Moses and the Israelite prophets intentionally emphasize the nearness of redemption to encourage the people to repent [דעת זקנים].

A broad spectrum of opinions exists regarding the identity of the future leader at the center of this vision. One perspective suggests the prophecy is entirely dedicated to the historical reign of King David [אבן עזרא, חזקוני, שפתי כהן]. The primary approach among commentators, however, asserts that the vision points exclusively to the Messiah [רמב״ן, רשב״ם, ספורנו, הטור הארוך, אור החיים]. A third, harmonizing approach divides the timeline into two distinct eras: the initial phase addresses the near future under King David, while the subsequent phase points toward the distant future of the Messiah and the ultimate redemption [רבנו בחיי, העמק דבר, מלבי״ם, אם למקרא]. Historically, this vision was so deeply associated with messianic expectations that Rabbi Akiva applied it to the military leader Shimon ben Koziba, famously renaming him Bar Kokhba under the initial belief that he was the promised redeemer [תורה תמימה].

The emergence of this leader is envisioned as a star stepping forth from the nation. This movement is understood in various ways: it can describe a celestial body shooting across the sky like a meteor or an arrow released from a drawn bow [רש״י, ביאור שטיינזלץ, ברכת אשר], a star treading a steady, fixed orbit in the heavens [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך, רש״ר הירש, אבן עזרא], or simply a gathering of immense power and strength [דעת זקנים, בכור שור]. The star itself symbolizes a king or messianic figure whose greatness radiates from afar, whose influence spans the globe, and who serves as a guiding light for all of humanity [רש״ר הירש, רלב״ג, נתינה לגר, העמק דבר]. Parallel to the star is the rising of a scepter, representing a ruling monarch, an emblem of power, or even a comet [רש״י, ביאור שטיינזלץ, בכור שור, מלבי״ם, אדרת אליהו]. Together, these twin images—the heavenly star and the earthly scepter—hint at two potential paths for redemption. If the Israelites are worthy, the redeemer will appear in a miraculous, heavenly manner like a star; if they are not, he will emerge through natural, earthly means as a ruling monarch [אור החיים].

The leader's military conquests involve striking the corners of the enemy territory. These corners represent either the physical borders and extremities of the land [שד״ל, ביאור שטיינזלץ] or the nation's princes and nobility [מזרחי, בכור שור, הדר זקנים]. Commentators agree that this aspect of the prophecy found historical fulfillment through King David, who decisively defeated Moab and measured its people with a line to determine their fate [רש״י, רבנו בחיי, העמק דבר, בכור שור, מלבי״ם, שפתי כהן].

The climax of the victory involves the complete dismantling of the descendants of Seth. This destructive action is characterized as tearing down, uprooting, and breaking through walls [שד״ל, רלב״ג, אבן עזרא, רש״ר הירש, מלבי״ם], or as deep gouging and excavating [רש״י, גור אריה]. A fascinating debate surrounds the identity of these descendants. The primary approach among commentators views them as a reference to all of humanity, as every human traces their lineage to Adam's son, Seth. This points toward a universal reign at the end of days [רמב״ן, רש״י, הטור הארוך, אבן עזרא, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Conversely, another approach narrows the focus to specific nations, arguing that the reference stems from a concept of nakedness and shame, alluding to the incestuous origins of certain neighboring peoples [שפתי כהן, חזקוני, הכתב והקבלה, הדר זקנים]. A final perspective understands the target not as a specific lineage, but as foundational structures, indicating that the future leader will tear down enemy nations from the ground up and completely uproot the infrastructure of idolatry [העמק דבר, רבנו בחיי, מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.