דברים, פרק ל״א, פסוק ט״ז

פרשת וילך

Deuteronomy 31:16Sefaria

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר יְהֹוָה֙ אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֔ה הִנְּךָ֥ שֹׁכֵ֖ב עִם־אֲבֹתֶ֑יךָ וְקָם֩ הָעָ֨ם הַזֶּ֜ה וְזָנָ֣ה ׀ אַחֲרֵ֣י ׀ אֱלֹהֵ֣י נֵכַר־הָאָ֗רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֨ר ה֤וּא בָא־שָׁ֙מָּה֙ בְּקִרְבּ֔וֹ וַעֲזָבַ֕נִי וְהֵפֵר֙ אֶת־בְּרִיתִ֔י אֲשֶׁ֥ר כָּרַ֖תִּי אִתּֽוֹ׃

A poignant transition occurs as Moses faces his final days, receiving a divine message that intertwines his personal mortality with the turbulent spiritual destiny of the Israelites. It is a moment of profound revelation, offering both comfort to the departing leader and a stark warning about the nation's future trajectory. The prophecy hinges on a dual meaning within the divine communication, specifically regarding the concept of rising [תורה תמימה, בכור שור, נתינה לגר, רא״ש]. On one level, the promise of rising is directed at Moses himself. He is assured that although he will soon lie with his ancestors, he will ultimately rise again, serving as a scriptural promise of resurrection [רבנו בחיי, תורה תמימה, חתם סופר]. God comforts Moses, assuring him that even though the people will inevitably falter after his passing, he must not despair, for there is ultimate hope and future restoration. Furthermore, Moses is granted a profound sense of peace; his soul will find refuge beneath the Throne of Glory in the World to Come [רבנו בחיי]. Though his physical body will rest in the earth, his spiritual influence will rise, continuing to live on and guide the Israelites through the Torah and the enduring song he imparted to them [שפתי כהן].

Conversely, the primary approach among commentators applies this concept of rising to the nation itself, immediately preceding their moral decline. It seems contradictory to describe a spiritual fall as a rising, but this upward movement actually symbolizes material success. It is precisely their comfortable establishment in the land and their physical satisfaction that will breed complacency, ultimately leading them to rebel [אור החיים]. This rebellion will not be a timid, secretive affair; rather, the Israelites will sin with their heads held high, acting out of a sense of legitimacy and brazen self-confidence [רש״ר הירש]. Alternatively, this rising points to a chronological shift, indicating that the generation of the desert will remain faithful, while a new generation will rise up and initiate the spiritual descent [אור החיים]. From another perspective, when a new generation of students turns to sin, it is as if they rise up as adversaries against their teacher, disturbing his peaceful rest in the grave [כלי יקר].

The nature of their spiritual betrayal evokes the imagery of a marriage, comparing the nation to a wife who strays from her husband. This moral deterioration does not happen overnight. It typically begins with a casual, almost accidental sin fueled by the negative influence of neighboring cultures. Over time, this initial slip spirals into a deliberate distancing from God, as the people actively seek out societies that permit a lifestyle free from the boundaries and warnings of the Torah [העמק דבר, ביאור יש״ר]. As they drift, the people will embrace foreign deities. The primary approach among commentators understands these simply as the gods worshipped by the foreign nations already residing in the region [רש״י, מזרחי, שפתי חכמים, גור אריה, ריב״א]. However, a deeper perspective suggests that these gods are inherently alien to the Land of Israel itself. While other nations of the world are subject to the influence of celestial ministers or constellations, the Land of Israel is directly guided and supervised by God. Therefore, introducing idolatry into this specific land is an offense of unparalleled severity, akin to bringing a total stranger into the private palace of the King [רמב״ן, רבנו בחיי, צאינה וראינה]. The Israelites will mistakenly conclude that to secure divine protection and agricultural bounty in their new home, they must appease the local deities, just as the previous inhabitants did [רש״ר הירש].

This idolatrous influence will take root deeply, permeating either the physical land itself [אבן עזרא, חזקוני, רמב״ן], the surrounding foreign nations [שד״ל, ביאור יש״ר], or, most profoundly, the very heart of the Israelites. The urge to worship idols will seep into their innermost being, even though these false deities are entirely alien and remain mute even to those who worship them [צרור המור]. Ultimately, this tragic process culminates in a complete fracture of the relationship with God, characterized by abandonment and a broken covenant. This entails a two-fold tragedy: abandoning God represents an internal loss of faith and a chilling of their love for Him, while breaking the covenant reflects the outward, practical reality of their sins and the shattering of their daily commitment to the Torah and its Commandments [תולדות יצחק, העמק דבר, אבן עזרא].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.