שמואל א, פרק ב׳, פסוק כ״ט

I Samuel 2:29Sefaria

לָ֣מָּה תִבְעֲט֗וּ בְּזִבְחִי֙ וּבְמִנְחָתִ֔י אֲשֶׁ֥ר צִוִּ֖יתִי מָע֑וֹן וַתְּכַבֵּ֤ד אֶת־בָּנֶ֙יךָ֙ מִמֶּ֔נִּי לְהַבְרִיאֲכֶ֗ם מֵרֵאשִׁ֛ית כׇּל־מִנְחַ֥ת יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל לְעַמִּֽי׃

A severe divine rebuke directed at Eli the Priest exposes a complete reversal of priorities within the Tabernacle. Instead of serving God and the people, the priests exploit their sacred positions for personal gain, displaying a blatant disrespect toward Heaven. Their behavior is likened to a well-fed animal lashing out in ingratitude against the very hand that feeds it [מצודת ציון, מצודת דוד]. This ungrateful rebellion is evident in how they treat the offerings, acting as though the sole purpose of the sacrifices is to fill their own stomachs. As a result, the Israelites distance themselves and avoid bringing offerings altogether [רד״ק]. Furthermore, there is a profound spiritual absurdity in their actions. The priests derive all their honor from being servants of God. By dismissing His portion and claiming their own meat first, they actively destroy the very foundation of their status and existence [מלבי״ם].

The priests compounded their wrongdoing by forcefully taking parts of the sacrifices that rightfully belonged to the people bringing them, rather than taking only the designated priestly shares [אלשיך, מלבי״ם]. The gravity of this sin is magnified by the location where it took place, the dwelling place of God. While the primary approach among commentators understands this simply as the Tabernacle, others emphasize that the sanctuary in Shiloh was not a temporary tent like the one used in the desert. It was a semi-permanent structure with stone walls. This established permanence granted it a heightened level of holiness, making the desecration there far more severe [אלשיך].

The central accusation against Eli is that he honored his sons more than God by failing to scold them or stop their wicked actions [רד״ק, מצודת דוד]. Some commentators frame this as a public disgrace, noting that Eli openly demonstrated to the nation that his sons' honor took precedence over God's [רש״י]. Eli is addressed alongside his sons as an active participant in this corruption because his silence made him an accomplice [מצודת דוד], and it is assumed that he himself ate the meat his sons brought home [רד״ק]. The priests' illegitimate goal was simply to feast and fatten their own bodies [רש״י, מצודת ציון, רד״ק, מלבי״ם, אלשיך] by claiming their meat before burning the parts dedicated to God [רש״י, מצודת דוד]. Ultimately, the sacrifices were intended for the atonement of the people, not to fatten the priests [מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This corruption had a devastating ripple effect. Seeing the religious leadership prioritize their own appetites over God's portion taught the public to treat holy matters with similar disrespect, indirectly leading the entire nation to consume their own sacrificial meals prematurely [אלשיך].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.