שמואל א, פרק ט״ו, פסוק כ״ט

I Samuel 15:29Sefaria

וְגַם֙ נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר וְלֹ֣א יִנָּחֵ֑ם כִּ֣י לֹ֥א אָדָ֛ם ה֖וּא לְהִנָּחֵֽם׃

A moment of profound crisis unfolds as a prophet informs a king that his rule has come to an end. In this difficult exchange, a sharp contrast emerges between human decisions, which are driven by regret and changing emotions [מצודת ציון, ביאור שטיינזלץ], and the absolute decisions of God. God serves as the eternal strength, hope, and inner life force of Israel [מצודת ציון, רלב״ג, מלבי״ם]. The primary approach among commentators is that the prophet clarifies to Saul that the decree removing the kingdom from him is completely final. Human beings often make exaggerated threats in anger only to calm down and change their minds, but God does not act this way [מלבי״ם, רד״ק]. Even if Saul were to fully repent, it would not restore his throne. The kingship has already been promised to another, and God never lies or retracts a good promise He has granted [רש״י, מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ, צאינה וראינה]. Additionally, Saul's rule, which came from the tribe of Benjamin, was fundamentally temporary. The eternal promise of kingship was designated for the tribe of Judah, and God will never break that vow [רד״ק, אלשיך].

This finality raises a philosophical question regarding Divine regret. If God does not change His mind or experience regret like a human being, how is it possible that He was previously described as regretting His decision to make Saul king? The accepted answer is that within God Himself, there is no change or regret whatsoever, for He is eternal. Any perceived change occurs entirely within the human beings receiving His influence. When a person alters their behavior and sins, God's relationship toward them shifts in response. This adjustment reflects the human's transformation, not any change or regret within the essence of the Creator [מצודת דוד, אברבנאל].

Alongside this main understanding, there are two distinct perspectives that offer a different view of the situation. One approach suggests that the inability to feel regret actually describes Saul rather than God. The punishment cannot be reversed because Saul is not someone who truly repents and turns away from his mistakes; instead, he stubbornly continues on his current path [אברבנאל]. Another perspective focuses on the concept of victory in the relationship between God and His people. Usually, God allows the Israelites to defeat Him through heartfelt prayer, taking joy when they ask for mercy and successfully cancel harsh decrees. In Saul's case, however, even though God is normally willing to be overcome by the prayers of His nation, pleading will not help. The decree stands because the kingship has already been officially transferred to another [אהבת יהונתן].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.