דברים, פרק ב׳, פסוק ח׳

פרשת דברים

Deuteronomy 2:8Sefaria

וַֽנַּעֲבֹ֞ר מֵאֵ֧ת אַחֵ֣ינוּ בְנֵי־עֵשָׂ֗ו הַיֹּֽשְׁבִים֙ בְּשֵׂעִ֔יר מִדֶּ֙רֶךְ֙ הָֽעֲרָבָ֔ה מֵאֵילַ֖ת וּמֵעֶצְיֹ֣ן גָּ֑בֶר {ס} וַנֵּ֙פֶן֙ וַֽנַּעֲבֹ֔ר דֶּ֖רֶךְ מִדְבַּ֥ר מוֹאָֽב׃

The desert journey of the Israelites reaches a geographical and spiritual turning point as they bypass the territories of Edom and Moab. The narrative highlights the complex relationship with the descendants of Esau, referring to them as brothers. This reflects the Israelites' strict obedience to God's command to avoid conflict and part in peace without military force [מלבי״ם]. It also acknowledges that the Edomites showed a degree of brotherhood by selling them food and water during the journey [אור החיים, ברכת אשר על התורה]. At the same time, maintaining this fraternal attitude highlights the nobility of the Israelites. They embraced this bond despite a stark contrast in their circumstances: while the Edomites resided in the lush, fertile region of Seir, the Israelites remained wandering exiles in the desert [שפתי כהן]. Notably, the historical account intentionally omits the Edomite king's harsh refusal to allow passage, aiming to cultivate a positive, dignified mindset within the nation as they prepared to enter their own land [רש ר הירש].

Avoiding war with these neighboring nations served a deeper purpose of instilling confidence. Just as God assisted Edom and Moab in securing their lands due to their ancestral connection to Abraham, He would surely assist the Israelites in inheriting the land of Canaan [אברבנאל]. As the journey continued past the adjacent settlements of Eilat and Etzion Geber [ביאור שטיינזלץ], a geographic debate emerges. One perspective suggests these are not the famous port cities later associated with King Solomon on the western coast, but rather distinct towns sharing the same names located on the eastern border [העמק דבר]. Conversely, another view maintains they are indeed the familiar cities, originally belonging to Edom before eventually passing to Solomon through his marriages to Edomite women [פענח רזא].

At this juncture, a unique phenomenon occurs in the traditional formatting of the Torah scroll: a sudden physical gap in the text right before the narrative shifts direction. This visual pause symbolizes a complete halt and the dawn of a brand-new phase in their travels [מנחת שי, חזקוני]. The primary approach among commentators is that after traveling along the southern borders and being denied direct passage by Edom, the Israelites were forced to bypass the territory entirely, changing their direction northward to trace the eastern border.

On a symbolic and historical level, this transition from Edom to Moab carries profound hints about the future of the nation. Circling the land of Esau represents an acceptance of the decree of exile under Edomite rule. Meanwhile, the subsequent pivot toward the Moabite desert points toward future redemption, alluding to the eventual rise of the Messiah, a descendant of David, who would trace his lineage back to Ruth the Moabite once the Edomite exile concludes [צרור המור]. Finally, mystical and Midrashic traditions view the actual route metaphorically, suggesting that walking along the desert plain symbolizes walking in the pleasant and sweet paths of the Torah [רבנו בחיי].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.