שמות, פרק כ״ב, פסוק כ״ו

פרשת משפטים

Exodus 22:26Sefaria

כִּ֣י הִ֤וא כְסוּתֹה֙ לְבַדָּ֔הּ הִ֥וא שִׂמְלָת֖וֹ לְעֹר֑וֹ בַּמֶּ֣ה יִשְׁכָּ֔ב וְהָיָה֙ כִּֽי־יִצְעַ֣ק אֵלַ֔י וְשָׁמַעְתִּ֖י כִּֽי־חַנּ֥וּן אָֽנִי׃ {ס}

Moving from dry legal statutes to a profound moral and emotional appeal, the law challenges a creditor to look past his financial rights and act with compassion. When a destitute borrower's most basic possessions are taken as collateral, his fundamental human dignity is at stake. Commentators categorize the garments involved in such pledges into two main types: the outer cloak worn during the day, and the inner tunic worn close to the skin, which also provides warmth at night [רש"י, תורה תמימה]. The specific phrasing used to describe these garments subtly hints at the poor person’s profound vulnerability and weakness [רש"ר הירש]. Furthermore, if the borrower's inner garment happens to be of high quality and value, the lender cannot force him to sell it to settle the debt and replace it with something cheaper. He must allow the poor man to keep his respectable clothing so that he does not suffer humiliation [העמק דבר, תורה תמימה, מלבי"ם, פענח רזא].

The borrower's deprivation also extends to his resting place. While most commentators understand this to include the very bedding he sleeps on at night [רש"י, מזרחי, רש"ר הירש], others suggest it refers to the cushions he uses for reclining during daytime meals [משכיל לדוד]. What makes this situation uniquely painful is that, unlike the illegal exploitation of orphans and widows, the lender holding the collateral is legally in the right. He advanced his own money and is fully entitled to secure his loan [רשב"ם, ריב"א, בכור שור]. Consequently, the poor man cannot protest against robbery or extortion; he can only weep over his freezing poverty [ספורנו]. His anguish peaks as he cries out to heaven, lamenting the stark inequality: though both are human beings, the lender rests comfortably in his bed while the borrower is left with nothing to cover himself [דעת זקנים, ביאור יש"ר, קאסוטו].

God's intervention in this dynamic stems entirely from mercy rather than strict justice. The divine declaration of being compassionate shares a linguistic root with the concept of giving something for free. God listens to the destitute man's cry and bestows His grace even if the borrower is not a particularly righteous or decent person. A wealthy lender must therefore be careful not to harden his heart or justify his cruelty by dismissing the poor man as wicked or unworthy of a hearing [רמב"ן, רבנו בחיי, כלי יקר, צאינה וראינה]. This dynamic reflects the very foundation of existence. All human beings owe massive debts to God, who takes our souls as a pledge every night and mercifully returns them each morning. People are expected to emulate God's profound mercy and display that same compassion toward those indebted to them [העמק דבר, תורה תמימה, מלבי"ם, ביאור יש"ר].

Ultimately, the lender's choice yields one of two results. If he acts with cruelty, God will hear the borrower's cry and punish the lender [אבן עזרא]. Conversely, if the lender goes beyond the strict letter of the law and returns the collateral, the relieved borrower will joyfully pray on his behalf. God will answer that prayer by blessing the lender with abundance far beyond his personal needs, enabling him to continue lending, supporting, and uplifting others [ספורנו, הטור הארוך, דעת זקנים, אדרת אליהו].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.