שופטים, פרק ג׳, פסוק ל״א

Judges 3:31Sefaria

וְאַחֲרָ֤יו הָיָה֙ שַׁמְגַּ֣ר בֶּן־עֲנָ֔ת וַיַּ֤ךְ אֶת־פְּלִשְׁתִּים֙ שֵֽׁשׁ־מֵא֣וֹת אִ֔ישׁ בְּמַלְמַ֖ד הַבָּקָ֑ר וַיּ֥וֹשַׁע גַּם־ה֖וּא אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃ {פ}

A sudden flash of local heroism emerges against a looming Philistine threat. A new leader steps forward, armed not with weapons of war, but with a simple farming tool, to fend off an immediate danger to his people. This event takes place right after the death of the previous leader, Ehud. Shamgar took on the role of judge in the very same year Ehud died, serving for only a single year [מצודת דוד, אברבנאל]. Because his time in leadership was so brief, his tenure is simply absorbed into the broader historical timeline, counted either as part of the twenty years of oppression under the Canaanite king Jabin and his general Sisera, or within the forty years of peace overseen by the prophetess Deborah [רלב״ג, אברבנאל].

While he is credited with bringing salvation, there is a general consensus among commentators that his success was minor and temporary, lacking the grand, sweeping victory of his predecessor [מצודת דוד, רלב״ג, מלבי״ם]. He operated more as a private hero protecting his immediate surroundings [ביאור שטיינזלץ] and stood at a lower level of leadership than Ehud [אברבנאל]. The profound weakness of this era is reflected in the absence of the standard phrasing that usually accompanies such leaders, which typically notes how long they judged the Israelites. This omission highlights a tragic reality: the people continued their evil behavior and simply refused to listen to their judges [רלב״ג, מלבי״ם].

The weapon used in this conflict was an ox goad. The primary approach among commentators is that this was a long wooden pole topped with a sharp, needle-like iron tip. It earned its name because farmers used it to "teach," direct, and urge draft animals forward during plowing [רש״י, מצודת ציון, רד״ק]. In the absence of proper military equipment, this agricultural tool was repurposed as a substitute for a spear [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Regarding the defeat of six hundred men, some suggest he did not strike them all down single-handedly, but rather led a band of fighters who assisted him in the clash [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Although defeating this number of men with a farming implement represents a somewhat limited military achievement, it was entirely sufficient to save the Israelites from the enemies who sought to harm them at that specific moment [אברבנאל].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.