When a person consecrates their ancestral field to the Temple and does not redeem it, the property undergoes a unique transfer of ownership during the Jubilee year. If the Temple treasurer sells the land to a third party, the arrival of the Jubilee year forces the field out of the buyer's possession, just like any other purchased land [רש״י, אבן עזרא, ביאור שטיינזלץ, רד״צ הופמן]. However, unlike regular fields that automatically return to their original owners, this consecrated land follows a completely different path. This specific transfer only occurs if the land is held by an outside buyer. If the original owner had redeemed the field himself, it remains securely in his possession and is never transferred to the priests [העמק דבר].
Once the field leaves the buyer's hands in the Jubilee year, it becomes holy to God. Instead of returning to the general Temple treasury, its status is equated to a devoted field, meaning it is given directly to the priests [רש״י, מזרחי, ביאור יש״ר]. Specifically, the land is awarded to the priestly ward actively serving in the Temple on Yom Kippur of that Jubilee year [רש״י, תורה תמימה, אדרת אליהו, רד״צ הופמן]. There are differing views regarding how the priests actually take possession of an unredeemed field. Some maintain that the priests receive the land entirely for free, while others argue that they must pay the Temple treasury the field's full fixed value of fifty shekels in order to acquire it [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, אדרת אליהו, רד״צ הופמן].
The comparison to a devoted field establishes a broader principle. Whenever a person devotes property without specifying its exact purpose, it defaults to the priests rather than the Temple treasury [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, אדרת אליהו]. Notably, these laws regarding devoted fields and their transfer to the priesthood are only active during historical periods when the Jubilee year is formally observed [תורה תמימה, אדרת אליהו].
Ultimately, the property that previously served as the original owner's ancestral inheritance transforms permanently into the holding of the priesthood [רשב״ם, ביאור יש״ר]. The specific legal definition of this holding establishes an important boundary for the priests themselves. If a priest happens to be the one who purchased the field from the treasurer, or if he consecrated his own personal field, he might assume he can simply keep it when the Jubilee arrives, arguing that the land is destined for the priests anyway. However, the law dictates that the property belongs to the collective priestly ward, not to any individual. The priest cannot retain the land for his private use; rather, it must be removed from his personal possession and divided equally among all the priests serving in his ward [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, דעת זקנים, חזקוני, אילת השחר, אדרת אליהו, רד״צ הופמן].