שמות, פרק ח׳, פסוק י״ט

פרשת וארא

Exodus 8:19Sefaria

וְשַׂמְתִּ֣י פְדֻ֔ת בֵּ֥ין עַמִּ֖י וּבֵ֣ין עַמֶּ֑ךָ לְמָחָ֥ר יִהְיֶ֖ה הָאֹ֥ת הַזֶּֽה׃

The plague of wild animals marks a profound shift in the events unfolding in Egypt. For the first time, a clear and precise level of divine providence becomes visible to all. The central miracle is not merely the sudden invasion of dangerous beasts, but rather the absolute boundary God establishes between the Egyptians and the Israelites, proving His complete mastery over the natural world.

The primary approach among commentators is that God enacted a strict separation, drawing a clear line between the two nations [רש״י, רשב״ם, אבן עזרא, שד״ל, קאסוטו]. Others view this act primarily as one of salvation and relief for the Israelites [ביאור יש״ר, נתינה לגר]. A unique perspective introduces the concept of a ransom. According to this view, there were wicked individuals among the Israelites who naturally deserved to suffer. To prevent the Egyptians from dismissing the event as a random disaster that strikes indiscriminately, God spared these Israelites. The Egyptians who suffered in their place effectively served as their ransom [העמק דבר, מלבי״ם]. On a deeper philosophical level, this division represents a shift from one domain to another, distinguishing those who rely on human strength from those who submit entirely to God [רש״ר הירש].

This divine protection was highly unusual and extended far beyond the geographical borders of the Israelite province of Goshen. Even if an Israelite and an Egyptian stood shoulder to shoulder in the heart of Egypt, a wild beast would attack only the Egyptian while completely ignoring the Israelite [ספורנו, אור החיים, רבינו בחיי, אבן עזרא, טור הארוך]. Conversely, an Egyptian hiding in Goshen could not escape the destruction [רלב״ג]. Yet, another view suggests that an Egyptian who actively fled and sought refuge among the Israelites would actually be spared [בכור שור]. Ultimately, this physical division served as a lasting model, declaring an eternal spiritual separation between Israel and the surrounding nations [הכתב והקבלה].

Even though this rescue was miraculous, it was not absolute. The biblical text subtly hints at an incomplete salvation, reflecting the reality that this rescue in Egypt would eventually be followed by further exiles and hardships. A complete and permanent redemption, free from any future subjugation, is reserved only for the ultimate future [רבינו בחיי, קיצור בעל הטורים, פני דוד, תולדות יצחק].

The specific timing of the plague, scheduled for the very next day, served multiple purposes. Primarily, it prevented the Egyptians from arguing that the invasion was a random natural occurrence, proving instead that every detail was guided by God and announced in advance [רשב״ם, חזקוני]. Additionally, delaying the disaster granted Pharaoh and his people a full day of grace, offering them a chance to repent. The plague struck only when they refused to change their ways [ביאור יש״ר]. Another explanation grounds this delay in the physical limits of nature. God commanded the animals immediately, but because these creatures lived in distant forests and deserts, they required a day of travel to reach the Egyptian cities. At the same time, any wild animals already roaming the Israelite areas needed this timeframe to completely clear out of the region [מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.