בראשית, פרק ל״ו, פסוק ל״ב

פרשת וישלח

Genesis 36:32Sefaria

וַיִּמְלֹ֣ךְ בֶּאֱד֔וֹם בֶּ֖לַע בֶּן־בְּע֑וֹר וְשֵׁ֥ם עִיר֖וֹ דִּנְהָֽבָה׃

The historical record of the early rulers in the land of Edom reveals a unique model of government that did not rely on family inheritance. Rather than a continuous royal dynasty passed down from father to son, different leaders took power over time. Because each ruler established a new capital in his own location, it is clear that the crown did not simply transfer through a single royal bloodline [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

Among these early rulers was a king named Bela son of Beor, a figure who sparked significant debate among scholars due to the striking similarity of his name to the famous Balaam son of Beor. Midrashic and Kabbalistic traditions suggest a direct connection, identifying this king as the very same person as Balaam [רקנאטי, מחוקקי יהודה]. In this spiritual framework, the nation of Edom represents the harsh attribute of strict justice. The name Bela implies a force of destruction and loss, while the name of his city, Dinhabah, is interpreted as a demand to deliver harsh justice. Together, these elements represent a destructive, deeply flawed force that nearly brought ruin to the world [רקנאטי]. Expanding on these traditions, some sources even link this figure back to Laban the Aramean, while another perspective suggests he was not an Edomite at all, but rather a military leader who arrived from Africa [מחוקקי יהודה].

Despite these spiritual connections, the overwhelming majority of literal commentators firmly reject the idea that these two men were the same person [אבן עזרא, שדל, ביאור שטיינזלץ, מחוקקי יהודה]. They argue that the two lived in entirely different eras and held completely different roles; one was an Edomite king, while the other was an Aramean sorcerer. They explain that the sages connected the two names to highlight a shared character trait rather than a historical fact, as both men were deeply involved in magic and divination [אבן עזרא, מחוקקי יהודה]. Historical and geographical details further support this separation. The mention of the king's hometown serves to identify his specific roots [שדל]. Historically, Dinhabah was a village located about eight miles from the Moabite city of Ar, near the Arnon stream [שדל]. Because Balaam famously hailed from a completely different city named Pethor, noting Dinhabah as the king's home firmly establishes that he and Balaam were two distinct individuals who merely happened to share a similar name [שדל, מחוקקי יהודה].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.