בראשית, פרק ט׳, פסוק ה׳

פרשת נח

Genesis 9:5Sefaria

וְאַ֨ךְ אֶת־דִּמְכֶ֤ם לְנַפְשֹֽׁתֵיכֶם֙ אֶדְרֹ֔שׁ מִיַּ֥ד כׇּל־חַיָּ֖ה אֶדְרְשֶׁ֑נּוּ וּמִיַּ֣ד הָֽאָדָ֗ם מִיַּד֙ אִ֣ישׁ אָחִ֔יו אֶדְרֹ֖שׁ אֶת־נֶ֥פֶשׁ הָֽאָדָֽם׃

After granting humanity the permission to slaughter and consume animals, a clear boundary is established to emphasize the absolute sanctity of human life. While taking animal life is permitted, human life remains the exclusive property of the Creator, and any harm brought to it is met with severe divine retribution [רמב״ן, רבנו בחיי, קאסוטו]. The primary approach among commentators is that this establishes the fundamental prohibition against suicide. Although a person sustains and maintains their own body, they do not possess the right to destroy it [רש״י, רמב״ן, רד״ק, מזרחי, מלבי״ם, בכור שור]. God demands accountability for the soul even if a person ends their life without shedding blood, such as through poisoning or strangulation [רש״י, מזרחי, הכתב והקבלה, חזקוני]. Because earthly courts cannot punish someone who has already died, God exacts this penalty in the World to Come [רד״ק, תורה תמימה, הכתב והקבלה]. This prohibition extends beyond death, serving as a warning against inflicting self-injury or cursing oneself [קיצור בעל הטורים, תורה תמימה]. However, there are extreme exceptions where surrendering one's life is permitted, such as King Saul falling on his sword to avoid enemy abuse, or individuals accepting martyrdom to sanctify God's name [רד״ק, הטור הארוך, פענח רזא, חזקוני, דעת זקנים].

Beyond self-inflicted harm, accountability extends to the animal kingdom. Most commentators understand this literally: although animals lack intellect and free will, God decreed that any beast that kills a human will be put to death in order to preserve human dignity and status. This serves as the legal foundation for the requirement to stone an ox that kills a person [רמב״ן, אבן עזרא, הטור הארוך, רש״ר הירש, קאסוטו, פרדס יוסף]. Because humans were given the right to kill animals, it was necessary to restore a natural fear of humanity upon the animal kingdom to prevent them from striking back [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך, רש״י]. Alongside this literal understanding, other approaches suggest that God avenges a murdered victim by sending wild beasts to punish the killer [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך, שד״ל, רלב״ג], or that this serves as a warning against deliberately feeding another person to a wild animal [הכתב והקבלה, תורה תמימה, חזקוני]. A unique conceptual approach interprets the word for beast as a reference to the eternal soul, suggesting that God demands the penalty for suicide directly from the soul once it is separated from the physical body [מלבי״ם, הכתב והקבלה, ביאור יש״ר].

A natural logical progression follows: if God demands accountability from an irrational beast, He will certainly demand it from a human being who commits murder [שד״ל, קאסוטו]. Framing humans as brothers is meant to awaken the human conscience, highlighting that all people share a universal brotherhood and every murder is fundamentally an attack on a sibling [רש״ר הירש, קאסוטו]. This accountability is absolute and covers indirect or nuanced forms of taking a life. It applies to someone who hires an assassin to kill on their behalf [הכתב והקבלה, תורה תמימה], as well as to complex situations where a life is ended out of misplaced mercy or love to relieve someone from suffering [הכתב והקבלה]. Even accidental killings require spiritual atonement [רש״י, פענח רזא]. If a murderer operates in secret and evades earthly justice due to a lack of witnesses, God Himself will exact justice from the heavens [רבנו בחיי, רש״י, חזקוני].

From a legal standpoint, the judicial process for a non-Jew regarding murder is notably streamlined; a conviction requires only a single witness and a single judge, without the need for prior warning, contrasting with the stricter evidentiary requirements applied to Israelites [מלבי״ם, תורה תמימה]. An exception to the rule of murder is the context of war, where killing is recognized as a tragic custom of the world and is not punished as conventional murder [העמק דבר]. Finally, the definition of bloodshed transcends physical violence. Publicly shaming another person is considered a profound violation of the divine image within them, rendering the act equivalent to the physical spilling of blood [אלשיך].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.