שמואל ב, פרק י״ב, פסוק ז׳

II Samuel 12:7Sefaria

וַיֹּ֧אמֶר נָתָ֛ן אֶל־דָּוִ֖ד אַתָּ֣ה הָאִ֑ישׁ {ס} כֹּה־אָמַ֨ר יְהֹוָ֜ה אֱלֹהֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל אָנֹכִ֞י מְשַׁחְתִּ֤יךָֽ לְמֶ֙לֶךְ֙ עַל־יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וְאָנֹכִ֥י הִצַּלְתִּ֖יךָ מִיַּ֥ד שָׁאֽוּל׃

The prophet shatters the illusion of a theoretical story, bringing a harsh reality directly into the king's life. By pointing out that David himself is the subject of the parable of the poor man's lamb, the prophet makes it clear that the tale is not a mere legend, but a precise reflection of David and his actions [ביאור שטיינזלץ, מצודת דוד].

This direct accusation carries profound moral weight. From a strictly technical standpoint, David's deeds might not have warranted the death penalty typically reserved for a murderer or adulterer, but rather the standard penalty of a thief who must repay what was stolen four times over. Yet, when evaluating the man himself, the severe death sentence he had just angrily declared applies fully to him. David is compared to the rich man in the parable because of his vast wealth. Having been anointed as king and granted personal, direct guidance from God, he should have kept God's kindness in mind and exercised extreme caution, even regarding a minor offense [מלבי״ם].

Commentators explore how the severe judgment David pronounced upon himself, an order to repay the stolen lamb fourfold, was ultimately realized. One perspective suggests that this fourfold payment was extracted through the tragic loss of four of his children: the first child born to Bathsheba, followed by Amnon, Absalom, and Adonijah. Another view argues that the payment was exacted when Absalom later slept with David's concubines in broad daylight. This served as a direct, measure-for-measure consequence for David initiating the taking of Uriah's wife.

Although David had declared that the perpetrator in the parable deserved to die, God spared his life. However, because David had relied on the sword of the enemy to have Uriah killed, a decree was set that the sword of his enemies would plague his own household for a long time. Consequently, the resulting tragedy sprouted from within his very own family [רלב״ג].

The narrative further emphasizes God's direct and personal involvement in David's life, specifically highlighting that God Himself was the one who anointed and saved him. A tradition teaches that when Samuel came to anoint David, the anointing oil leaped on its own from Samuel's hand directly onto David's head. This miraculous event showed that God personally anointed him as king. Just as God anointed him directly, He also personally saved him from the hands of Saul [חומת אנך]. This history of direct, personal kindness from God only deepens the severity of David's actions and the expectations placed upon him.

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.